BENGHAZIGATE’S Stink Bombs…Steadily Creeping To The Fore…Regardless Of The Regime’s Spinmeisters…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As this blogger indicated from the onset, Benghazigate had everything to do with gunrunning/weapon smuggling – after the illegal invasion of Libya – and nothing to do with freeing the populace from Qadaffi’s rule. Most importantly, euphemistically coined “leading from behind” was no such thing. It was a full throttle U.S. led operation.

More to the point, it was crazy Qadaffi who kept Al Qaeda terrorists at bay – since they were a direct threat to his rule – and at least he pretty much hewed to US dictates, despite his outlandish rhetoric. In other words, he was terrified of America’s hyper-power. And that was a good thing!

Nevertheless, the Pyromaniac-in-Chief beats to an Islamist drummer, therefore, Samantha Power’s “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) was utilized. So, without Congressional approval, an illegal war was waged but smoke screened under “leading from behind”. The biggest lie/cover up in U.S. history, bar none.

It was under this political cover that the purposefully misnamed consulate was utilized as a shopping bazaar – lock, stock and barrel – for all manner of Muslim Brotherhood operatives, aka Islamists. Of course, to keep their illegal activities under wraps, lies were piled atop lies and security was mostly non-existent, unlike at a regular consulate!

Readers can journey down Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s deadly misadventure by unraveling the links within - adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/27/benghazigates-petraeus-testimony-will-ensnare-the-potus-his-gang-addendum-to-covering-up-benghazigate-exquisite-political-timing-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And Northeast Intelligence Network picks up the hunt -

‘Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”

Doug Hagmann Wednesday, November 28, 2012

DH: It’s been a while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?

II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest. Every politician, whether it’s a congressman senator, diplomat, or their spokespeople and the media arelying to the American public every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can create a wrong image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert any questions about our activities there.

DH: Let’s go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?

DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation did not draw attention to what was going on there.

II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the operation was already winding down.

DH: I know you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation at Benghazi.

II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was the matter of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical weapons – gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a ‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were telling the American public. That’s not really what was going on, though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you can find picturesand videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the public’s consumption.

What was really happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is that we had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working from those that weren’t, and making a big show of destroying the weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct.

The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was the ‘choke point’ of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among ‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.

From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the Assad government.

Why Syria, why not Iran?

II: It’s both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look at the bigger picture, look at the so-called “Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by default, who doesn’t? Who is the architect for what’s going on throughout the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to be accomplished.

The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s private army. I think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi’s interests. It’s about religious dominance and oil. Who is really benefitting from, say, what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.

Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.

But think further – three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s largest oil producer, and that’s Russia’s primary source of income. Then there’s Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation.

So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of Russia’s economic health and military capabilities. Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what they want?

Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.

What about Assad’s war crimes?

Assad is no angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now this is important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the Human Rights Caucus – she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and every war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!

After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was Al-Sabah, and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR firm out of New York. People must learn the back story.

So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing, Assad’s people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge ‘false flag’ operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait.

It’s one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people behind this are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re laughing at us.

And do you want to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed in Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.

You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about Obama’s submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Where’s the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it’s that serious.

What are Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.

Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike, and I’ll explain more about this shortly, because there are events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their currency – the Ruble. They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?

So, how do, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area where we are very vulnerable? It’s our economy – our dollar. What’s our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say it’s not tied to anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL. The free-flow of oil.

Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and services. As Michael Reaganwrote: “[t]his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It’s the core of our foreign policy.” He also wrote that “any attack on the free flow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!”

www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51346

As a post read incentive and for your video pleasure, Senator James Inhofe delivers the goods - 

‘Video: Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) says Benghazi the ‘biggest cover-up in history’

 on NOVEMBER 28, 2012

shoebat.com/2012/11/28/video-senator-james-inhofe-r-ok-says-benghazi-the-biggest-cover-up-in-history/

Another Republican Senator posits the following: shoebat.com/2012/11/29/republican-senator-raises-great-question-about-susan-rices-role-at-state-during-kenya-tanzania-bombings/ - is Susan Rice’s past tenure at State the prologue to her “involvement” in the Libyan muck? What’s up with these revolutionary gangsteretts…the female version of their counterparts, the gangsters-in-suits…this blogger is pointing to Susan Rice, Huma Abedin, Samantha Powers & their elder “stateswoman”, Hillary – yes, THAT Clinton!

But it must also be internalized: while the Ambassador and the others who were murdered surely knew the risks – as well as the lies being told to the American public – it was also the case that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief) and surrogates were DUTY bound to answer their pleas for help.

And it is always the case, when you lie down with radical American dogs, in tandem with Islamic jihadists, you wake up – if you are lucky – with a lot more than fleas. Nevertheless, the Americans caught in the (barbaric) cross fire hardly believed that their leaders would feed them to Islamist wolves.

They did. Americans died. 

About these ads

17 thoughts on “BENGHAZIGATE’S Stink Bombs…Steadily Creeping To The Fore…Regardless Of The Regime’s Spinmeisters…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Adina, I’m troubled, aside from a rare photo opportunity at a church – usually when the public takes notice – it recently occurred to me that the only religious affiliations our most prominent Democrats seem to have is with Islam. Have I gone stark raving mad for wondering if many of our public servants, to include Hillary Clinton and Colin Powell haven’t in fact converted. Obama would have no need to. He is what he is.

    Thanks

  2. The US Constitution defines the crime of treason in Article III as “Treason against the United States, shall consist only of levying War against them, or adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt act, or on Confession in open Court.” (caps in the original.)

    Seems to me like aiding and abetting al Qaeda by arming them qualifies under that definition. Assisting the Muslim Brotherhood with money and encouragement sure sounds like “Comfort” to our enemies to me. Next up: two Witnesses. Well, Chris Stevens won’t be testifying, will he? Nor will the other 3 men killed. How convenient.

    The reason this arming and comforting is different than other proxy wars the US government has waged (say, aiding the Afghan Northern Alliance against the Soviets) is that now we know, or reasonably ought to know, that al Qaeda, the Muslim Bros and other assorted Islamic fighters are at war with us and want to fundamentally destroy the United States, to add it to the Islamic Caliphate. Thus we have the politically correct refusal of the Obama administration to call an Islamic terrorist act what it is; they can’t admit that Islamists are our enemies. These Islamists are not Obama’s enemies, of course, since he’s a Muslim himself. But he is an enemy of the US and Israel.

    I think that many prominent Democrats are in sympathy with the Islamists for their similar wills to totalitarian dictatorship. Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton, for example, are unlikely to actively want to be Muslim women living under shariah law unless they have unrealistic notions of what that would mean. Useful idiots like Sandra Fluke would be stoned under shariah law, which I doubt she and others like her comprehend.

    • Thanks, Sam. You’ve put my mind at rest regarding conversion, anyway. Now, who will the two witnesses be who will step up to the plate and charge Obama with treason?

      • Happy to help, Michal. I’m not sure your mind should be at rest though, lol. I think Colin Powell and others like him, if they are Christian, justify their support of the Obama administration on the basis of race. And keep in mind that many blacks, especially the men, are Muslims even though they may call themselves Christian. Obama and his family went to Trinity United Church in Chicago. This church is well known for preaching liberation theology, which is a combination of Marxism with a form of Christianity. The church is also sympathetic to the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan’s black Muslim religion. Liberation theology is often masked by calling it social justice, which desires equal outcomes for all. Not equal opportunity, mind you, but equal outcomes. So we will all be equally poor, except for the ruling class since they feel they deserve it.

  3. I just blogged on the interview as well at inthisdimension.com.

    This needs to get legs. The traitorous actions – there is no other word – of Obama must be stopped. If this can get serious legs – get it on Drudge, RCP, front page, etc., the possibility exists that when the Electoral College meets on 12/17 they can & will vote Romney in and the Islamist in Chief … OUT.

  4. Pingback: World War 3′s Place Markers Set Up Through Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Mid East Fires…Addendum To: Northeast Intelligence Network Posits A Direct Nexus…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  5. Pingback: BENGHAZIGATE’S Truths Ensnaring (Some) Leftist Media…Admitting That Qadaffi’s Main Beneficiary Is Al Qaeda…Addendum To: Benghazigate’s Stink Bombs…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  6. Pingback: BENGHAZIGATE’S Truths Ensnaring (Some) Leftist Media…Admitting That Qadaffi’s Main Beneficiary Is Al Qaeda…Addendum To: Benghazigate’s Stink Bombs…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  7. Pingback: Hillary’s Benghazigate Stonewall: Will She Or Won’t She Testify? That IS The Question…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  8. Pingback: Islamists Of All Stripes Gunning For Syria’s Chemical Arsenals…Reaching Its Perimeter…Addendum To: The Unleashing Of A World War Via Russia…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  9. Pingback: Islamists Of All Stripes Gunning For Syria’s Chemical Arsenals…Reaching Its Perimeter…Addendum To: The Unleashing Of A World War Via Russia…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  10. Pingback: CIA’s Panetta Leaves A Parting “Gift”…An Important Admission Re Benghazigate…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  11. Pingback: A HellFire Unleashed By Barack HUSSEIN Obama…Smack On Israel’s Borders & Beyond…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  12. I managed to get through most of all above, with my anxiety creeping up all along the way; I had a clue; I thought I had a clue, but only the barest of bare-bones idea of what obamEtal are doining! I thank all who American Patriots (and loyal friends) who contributed; as for anyone poseing as one of us, you’re dealing with “WeThePeople”!

    • Indeed, I (and there are MANY American-Israelis who feel the same!) am a dedicated Tea Party patriot and live in Israel as it is my Jewish homeland, but will never stop caring about my birthplace. Therefore, will not stop trying to keep her safe, hence, the digging will continue…..

  13. Pingback: The POTUS’s “Miscalculations” Are Driving N Korean & Iranian Bellicosity…Almost To The Brink…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  14. Pingback: BENGHAZIGATE’s CRIMINAL Cover Up: Hiding Witnesses, Changing Identities & Repeatedly Polygraphing CIA Survivors…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s