Benghazigate’s Petraeus Testimony Will Ensnare The POTUS & His Gang…Addendum To: Covering Up Benghazigate Exquisite Political Timing…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As in all walks of life, and regardless of ones station, when a person has little to lose they often go for broke. Meaning, even though the mighty and powerful have a greater threshold for pain – due to their built-in layers of insulation – they too have their limits.

Thus, Petraeus’s armor was pierced the moment he was forced (whichever way he was enticed) to lie down, and this blogger is not referring to his extramarital carnal bliss. Ahh…the stupidity of too many middle aged men, regardless of their profession and position.

But the reader must first take a stroll from Benghazigates’s underpinnings, which leads squarely here –

And as the lies keep growing bigger – sort of like Pinnochio’s can’t make this stuff up – the Liar-in-Chief (surrogates too) keeps spinning and weaving –

The more they open their traps, the closer diggers get to their filthy core – (immoral) stench is overpowering, especially for those who value cleanliness.

Which leads to the sacrificing/scapegoating of a CIA Chief, timed exquisitely for political theater – dead Americans be damned –

Stage left/right…enter femme fatales…and the General’s unraveling Ensnared in a honey trap….

Regardless, the buck stops with the faux Commander-in-Chief, a man unworthy of shepherding cattle, let alone the free world.



November 19, 2012
“Until Friday, there were two possible explanations for why the White House failed to immediately call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism. One was incompetence, the other was worse.

Now there is only one, and it is the worse one. Based on the persuasive testimony of ex-CIA boss David Petraeus, it is clear the Obama administration made a deliberate decision to mislead Congress and the American people.

The repeated claim that the attack was spontaneous and grew out of a demonstration against an anti-Islam video – a claim made by the president and secretary of State as they stood next to the bodies of four dead Americans – was a monstrous lie. It was vile and done for the basest of reasons.

Because we now know the truth of what happened – CIA reports were edited to remove the names of al Qaeda groups involved in the attack, Petraeus said under oath – we also know the motive. It was political self-preservation, meaning the president and his team put politics first.

The timing helps tell the tale. Just days removed from his Charlotte convention, where he danced on the grave of Osama bin Laden and boasted that al Qaeda was decimated, Obama couldn’t bear to admit that affiliated groups were thriving in North Africa. And he certainly couldn’t admit they had carried out a murderous attack on our consulate on the 11th anniversary of the most awful day in American history.

To do so would be to acknowledge the failure of his decision to ignore hard-line Islamists and that his team had erred egregiously in rejecting pleas for more security from Libya Ambassador Chris Stevens.

So the president lied, including in a speech to the United Nations, where he cited the video as the reason for the attack. He sent out reams of flunkies to do the same, including his snide press secretary, Jay Carney.

Most notably, UN Ambassador Susan Rice went on five Sunday television shows to spin the nonsense about the hijacking of a demonstration – a demonstration that never existed. Rice made a fool of herself, and now, she, too is damaged goods.”

Alas, more and more dung is amassing at the POTUS’s door, as highly respected, conservative commentator Erik Rush struts his stuff. Erik, give ’em hell.

‘Now it Gets Ugly

– Erik Rush  Sunday, November 18, 2012

“The craven but successful ploy on the part of the administration to defer addressing the issue of Benghazigate until after the election is evident, unless one is a consumer of the establishment press (mainstream media). The American public is being encouraged to focus upon the romantic dalliances of fallen CIA Director General David Petraeus with a predatory publicity hound, and obscure emails between an ugly Middle Eastern-American socialite, the publicity hound, and another general. This, I suppose, would be in lieu of focusing upon the effluvia of lies being fire-hosed from the mouths of President Obama and his administration vis-à-vis the events of September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya.

These deceptions have been so blatant and so outlandish that I can only describe them as surreal. At House and Senate intelligence committee hearings this week, intelligence officials ostensibly tried to explain their deportment on September 11 as regards the reported pleas for aid leading up to and through the attack on the consulate in Benghazi. Meanwhile – with help in distraction from the press – the administration continues to purvey contradicting accounts of whether or not aid was requested by slain Ambassador Christopher Stevens and CIA operatives, while at the same time attempting to clarify that very matter.

During a recent press conference, Obama was unable to answer a correspondent’s question addressing whether he had attempted to render aid to the beleaguered personnel in Benghazi on September 11. His obfuscation would have been taken as the mutterings of a mental defective were it any other individual. Obama’s faux chivalry in his defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice, who blanketed the media with the fairy tale tying the Benghazi attack and other Middle East uprisings to an anti-Islam video, was rife with petulance, comical challenges, and self-contradiction. One can almost hear the scrambling of feet as White House and intelligence operatives scurry to prepare their CYA briefsObama’s faux chivalry in his defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice”

And so it will unfold…when a man’s entire persona is wrapped in machismo (heck, even a wimpy looking General – throughout his career – has to possess nerves of steel); wearing ones medals on an already puffed up chest; presenting himself as a stand up guy; the admission of infidelity – stepping down to boot – is more than a lethal sting. It is a wrecking ball. A mortal/moral blow.

So, regardless of all his strategic prowess (and it is considerable) he is now left with a reputation in tatters. And it is this cheapened, bloodied soiling which will end up ensnaring the Pyromaniac-in-Chief, though likely behind closed doors.

The mightier they are the harder they fall. And the erstwhile General’s mega ego has been splattered before the world’s stage.

Everything and anything is on the table. The (true) tales he will tell. Nowhere to run…nowhere to hide – thus, (eventually) encircling the POTUS!

5 thoughts on “Benghazigate’s Petraeus Testimony Will Ensnare The POTUS & His Gang…Addendum To: Covering Up Benghazigate Exquisite Political Timing…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Pingback: Why Benghazi is an Impeachable Offense | Conservative Angle

  2. Pingback: BENGHAZIGATE’S Stink Bombs…Steadily Creeping To The Fore…Regardless Of The Regime’s Spinmeisters…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  3. Pingback: Hillary’s Benghazigate Stonewall: Will She Or Won’t She Testify? That IS The Question…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  4. Pingback: Benghazigate’s Indictment – Of An Islamist-in-Chief – Supported By Retired Four Star Admiral…Other Heavyweights Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  5. Pingback: BENGHAZIGATE About To Be Blown Wide Open: General Petraeus Has MEGA Scores To (Rightfully) Settle…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s