Since the military chain of command is subordinate to the Commander-in-Chief all manner of (political/ideological) mischief is possible. Few dare to contemplate said ramifications, preferring to believe that a patriot is at the helm, even if miscalculations transpire.
Go back to sleep.
However, many clear thinkers understand that the current Commander-in-Chief is anything, but a patriot. No need to rework this anti-American wheel.
Nevertheless, what is less known are the plans in place to exact an outcome which most lovers of liberty find absolutely untenable. In this regard, my blog post ‘Barack Hussein Obama’s Reflexive Disdain For Us Military Power..His (Planned) Disenfranchisement Of The Troops..’ - http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/09/barack-hussein-obamas-reflexive-disdain-for-us-military-power-his-planned-disenfranchisement-of-the-troops-ditto-his-surrogates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ - is designed to start the dialogue.
So, hot on the heels of the above commentary, another piece of their treacherous puzzle emerges – sort of like droppings from dog poop….stink… after stink…after stink – no offense to my gorgeous Golden Retriever.
The Washington Times screamed this blaring Editorial ‘The Civil War of 2016′ - effectively informing loyal Americans – wake up, before America becomes your nightmare !
“Imagine Tea Party extremists seizing control of a South Carolina town and the Army being sent in to crush the rebellion. This farcical vision is now part of the discussion in professional military circles.”
“At issue is an article in the respected Small Wars Journal titled “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.” It was written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army’s University ofForeign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., andJennifer Weber, a Civil War expert at the University of Kansas. It posits an “extremist militia motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement” seizing control of Darlington, S.C., in 2016, “occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council and placing the mayor under house arrest.” The rebels set up checkpoints on Interstate 95 and Interstate 20 looking for illegal aliens. It’s a cartoonish and needlessly provocative scenario.”
“The article is a choppy patchwork of doctrinal jargon and liberal nightmare. The authors make a quasi-legal case for military action and then apply the Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 to the situation. They write bloodlessly that “once it is put into play, Americans will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it were acting overseas.” They claim that “the Army cannot disappoint the American people, especially in such a moment,” not pausing to consider that using such efficient, deadly force against U.S. citizens would create a monumental political backlash and severely erode government legitimacy.”
“The vision is hard to take seriously. As retired ArmyBrig. Gen. Russell D. Howard, a former professor at West Point, observed earlier in his career, “I am a colonel, colonels write a lot of crazy stuff, but no one listens to colonels, so I don’t see the problem.” Twenty years ago, then-Air Force Lt. Col. Charles J. Dunlap Jr. created a stir with an article in Parameters titled “The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.” It carried a disclaimer that the coup scenario was “purely a literary device intended to dramatize my concern over certain contemporary developments affecting the armed forces, and is emphatically not a prediction.”
“The scenario presented in Small Wars Journal isn’t a literary device but an operational lay-down intended to present the rationale and mechanisms for Americans to fight Americans. Col. Benson and Ms. Weber contend, “Army officers are professionally obligated to consider the conduct of operations on U.S. soil.” This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders should spend their time studying.”
“A professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least inCol. Benson’s case, whether his views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against American citizens.” - http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/aug/7/the-civil-war-of-2016/ .
As such, it is more than fair (mind you, this regime is obsessed with ‘fairness’) to posit that poisonous anti-Americanism has seeped into the military echelon and its war journals.
In fact, the firing of a prof (who knows how many more were given a kick in the pants for the ‘crime’ of not bowing to Islam) at the Joint Forces Staff College “relieved of duty in June for uttering that the United States is at war with Islam”, bespeaks their bias in favor of Islam, at the expense of American security !
Is it possible that the band of thieves ruling Washington want to intentionally instigate a civil war, to make it easier to extend Marshall Law ? Of course, if the Chief Instigator believes he will hold the reins of power for another 4 years, his actions are readily transparent – even though he, and his entire administration, is shrouded in deceit.
A real role model.
Perversely, no more than a decade has passed since Islamic barbarians crashed through American skyscrapers, yet American leaders are rolling out the green carpet for their twisted tenets, bowing their posteriors before Islam. Their scraping puts an American twist to the precise meaning of Islam - submission . You can’t make this crap up.
Have they no honor? No pride? No sense of American ethos?
Besides, is this any way to lead the (heretofore) free world, other than into the hellish depths of (Islamic) darkness ?
Significantly, is there any viable reason why patriots in the military should feel protected, not only by their military command, but by their Commander-in-Chief ?
Give me one solid reason.
More importantly, US troops will be forced to turn against fellow patriots.
Barack & gangsters - Does ‘eating ones own’ resonate ?