IF the Commander-in-Chief is informed by the nation’s security heads that it is impossible to properly vet those who seek “refugee” status from terror-ridden countries – with the real likelihood that terrorists will sneak in through the process – what exactly should a patriotic leader’s immediate, unequivocal response be? Should he opt to hold off on their entry, or speed it up? This requires a yes or no answer, and there is no middle ground or margin for error. Many lives are on the line and rest in his hands.
INHERENTLY, what kind of leader gambles with national security? What sort of leader ignores the fact that many of these same Muslims from Syria (and elsewhere) slaughter those who refuse to submit/convert to Islam, most recently, Christians in Syria and countless in Nigeria? Thus, does he believe, once settled in the U.S., that it will turn out any differently? Besides, whose lives is he sworn to protect, the citizens, or those who will likely cause them harm?
FBI Director James Comey, flanked by the nation’s top intelligence officials, admitted to the House Homeland Security Committee Wednesday that for some of the 10,000 Syrian refugees the administration has agreed to allow into the U.S., there will be no basis to vet them through the databases it uses to determine if they have ties to terrorism.
“We can only query against that which we have collected, and so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interests reflected in our database, we can query our database til the cows come home, but … there’ll be nothing show up, because we have no record on that person,” said Comey.
NOT only that, the urgent questions become: shouldn’t it be a priority to press counterparts from Islamic countries to take in their own brethren – as is their moral duty – instead of flooding them into America which is built upon Judeo-Christian underpinnings? Is it a secret that Muslims adhere to Shariah Law, that which is overtly hostile to Judaism and Christianity, never mind any secular outlook? Moreover, the bugaboo that America is a land of immigrants, thus, “obligated” to take them in, doesn’t hold water. Yes, we all recognize that the U.S. embraces immigrants from all over the world. But how does that justify letting in people who can’t be vetted and whose cultural and religious underpinnings are at war with the nation? It doesn’t. And herein lies the crux.
BY steadfastly lying about Islam’s roots, instead, harping on multiculturalism as an American “imperative“, HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) has purposefully flipped the truth upside its head. But to what end? In a word, hijrah!
Hijrah is the Islamic doctrine of migration, which is a form of stealth jihad.
“To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act,” Spencer wrote. He cited the following Quranic text:
“And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance,” says the Quran. “And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful” (Quran 4:100).
IN fact, more than one jihadist smuggler said ISIS has laid ambitious plans for the future of Europe and America:
“It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world,” he said, “and we will have it soon, God willing.”
“There are some things I’m allowed to tell you and some things I’m not,” he said.
The revelation came just days after a spokesperson for Islamic State called on Muslims in the West to carry out terror attacks.
The jihadist told Western followers if they had the opportunity to “shed a drop of blood” in Western countries – then they should do so.
WHAT is so hard to understand about that? Besides, are Allah’s Muslim Terrorists hiding their intentions? Or, could it be that HUSSEIN Obama wants America to be overrun with militant Islamic jihadists, in the same manner in which Europe is being decimated? Indubitably.
TAKE Berlin, as just one example out of enumerable!
The report, which reveals how Arab migration has transformed Berlin’s entire criminal landscape, exposes how extended migrant families, now recruiting new migrants, run the entirety of the city’s organised crime.
The report speaks of the ‘amazing’ sight of luxury sedans cruising up to refugee, asylum centre, and migrant lodgings filled with “people who have lost everything.”
Investigators reported that the criminal gangs have “exploited the situation” of the migrant crisis, in which German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s policies saw well over a million migrants from the third world world settle in Europe last year.
The source explained that “young and physically strong men” are targeted by the gangs and then used for “dirty work” like burglaries, drug trafficking, and fights with criminal competitors. Child refugees are also welcomed as their faces are unknown to the police.
Despite the prospect of arrest, or even going to prison, many of the new arrivals are willing to take the risk as it is unlikely they will be deported.
Germany’s problems with its immigrant population are nothing new. According to authorities in Berlin the majority of the city’s organised crime is controlled by seven to nine extended families who came in the late 1970s from Lebanon.
Dirk Jacob, the director of the State Criminal Police Office (LKA), describes how the clans specialize in property crime and drug trafficking. They show their power in the city with highly visible stunts such as the “daring daylight heist” which saw a masked gang armed with assault rifles, machetes and hand grenades steal the jackpot from a poker tournament at the Hyatt Hotel, and “spectacular heists” at Berlin’s iconic Kaufhaus des Westens luxury department store.
Despite all efforts Jacob says it’s “extremely difficult to penetrate” these extended families as they are “solid structures” that can be cracked “only through lengthy and costly investigations.” Describing problems policemen run into when faced with the clans’ criminal machinations he says if for example, a family member of a competitor is knocked down or seriously injured with a knife, officials have little time to secure the testimony of witnesses……Mr. Kuhr, who has detailed insight into Berlin’s underworld, declared the capital is “lost” as “[the clans’ structures] are manifested in all areas of organized crime”. In addition, he concluded “the people are extremely dangerous” and have no respect for the state.
SO in light of all the above, plus so much, isn’t it an act of treason to FLOOD Syrian “refugees” into the nation at a rate of 358 per week, let alone one a week?
The Obama administration has decided to implement a “surge” in Syrian refugees, fast-tracking the arrival of those fleeing civil war in that country to make good on its commitment of bringing 10,000 by the end of fiscal 2016.
The Obama administration’s scripted answer for anyone who questioned its ability to screen Syrian “refugees” was that they are the “most thoroughly vetted” of all immigrants, going through an arduous process that takes 18 to 24 months to complete.
But that process was taking longer than expected and making it impossible for Obama to make good on his promise to the United Nations to admit at least 10,000 Syrians in fiscal 2016.
To fulfill its promise, the administration has now decided to expedite the process, cutting the screening period from 18-24 months down to three months.
Administration officials have set up special screening centers in Jordan, where they will be interviewing potential Syrian refugees at a rate of 600 per day.
To realize the goal of 10,000 Syrian refugees coming to the U.S. by Sept. 30, the government will need to deliver 8,589 by that date, or an average of 358 per week.
As WND has previously reported, more than 98 percent of the Syrian “refugees” have been Sunni Muslims while only 1 percent have been Christians. Yet, it’s the Christians who are being systematically exterminated in what even the United Nations has termed a “genocide” by ISIS and other Sunni rebel groups operating in Syria and Iraq.
FBI Director James Comey has testified before Congress that even with the longer 18-24 months of vetting, it was impossible to verify the identities of the vast majority of Syrian refugees.
“Whenever unilateral political actions are taken to ‘speed up’ a complex program, which is already known to be fraught with uncertainty, it becomes virtually impossible for officials to conduct a reliable vetting process,” Philip Haney, a former Homeland Security investigator who retired last year, told WND. “And, the figure of (nearly) 9,000 is a ‘floor,’ not a final number.”
Several GOP congressmen held hearings and sent letters to Obama voicing their opposition to the Syrian refugee program. But in the end, Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., put together an omnibus spending bill that fully funded Obama’s expanded refugee program.
The program will bring 85,000 refugees to the U.S. from all countries in fiscal 2016, about half of them coming from Muslim-majority nations such as Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan and Iraq. The total is scheduled to increase again in fiscal 2017 to 100,000.
The top states for Syrian refugee resettlement over the first six months of the fiscal year have been Michigan with 173, California with 138, Pennsylvania with 126 and Illinois with 98.
But those numbers are now expected to balloon quickly.
Michigan alone is in line to receive at least 5,000 Syrians this year.
Just in the last 10 days, Missouri has received 16 Syrians, Ohio has received 14, Arizona 12, Illinois 11, Pennsylvania nine, Michigan seven and Indiana five.
Michigan is receiving the largest number this year even though GOP Gov. Rick Snyder has informed Obama he doesn’t want any Syrian refugees, citing the security risks.
By expediting the vetting period, the administration hopes to increase by nearly 10-fold the number of Syrians it brings to the U.S. in the second half of the fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.
Gina Kassem, the regional refugee coordinator at the U.S. embassy in Amman, Jordan, told the Associated Press that while the 10,000 target applies to Syrian refugees living around the world, the majority of those being resettled in America will be coming from refugee camps in Jordan.
And the number of Syrians delivered to the United States could go above the target of 10,000.
“The 10,000 is a floor and not a ceiling, and it is possible to increase the number,” she told reporters.
More than two dozen mostly GOP governors informed Obama after the Paris terror attacks last November they didn’t want any Syrian refugees delivered to their states, but the administration said the states have no authority to stop the program from being carried out.
At least two of the eight Islamic terrorists who killed 130 Parisians entered Europe as “refugees” from Syria.
Former Rep. Michele Bachmann, whose home district in Minnesota has been flooded with Somali refugees over the past 20 years, was one of the first lawmakers to warn of the security risks associated with the importation of refugees from jihadist hotbeds in the Middle East and Africa.
Dozens of refugees have been arrested for providing material support to overseas terrorists over the past few years.
“We on the House Intelligence Committee warned a year ago that Syria is incapable of vetting people for terrorism detection,” Bachmann said. “It is impossible because Syria has no database of records for the U.S. to peruse, and the U.S. has no embedded human intelligence in Syria.
ISIS, meanwhile, has accumulated a cache of fake passports. They have used these passports to infiltrate Europe, and critics of the administration like Bachmann warn they will duplicate the same successful strategy to infiltrate the United States.
“We also know ISIS captured actual Syrian passports and the actual machines used to create Syrian passports,” Bachmann said. “The terrorists have the means within their control to create legitimate passports for fellow terrorists.
“This should be sufficient information to stop any migration to the U.S. from Islamic terror dominated nations.”
ISIS operatives have bragged they have already embedded 4,000 refugee terrorists in Europe.
“The same will be true for the U.S.,” Bachmann told WND. “We U.S. taxpayers are paying dearly for our own destruction.
“Why isn’t Obama singling out persecuted Christians for a ‘surge’ mission of mercy?” she asked.
“Christians are the true Middle East victims of Islamic genocide. Instead, Obama chooses likely terrorist aggressors to bring to America,” she said.
Also troubling is the fact that most Syrian Muslims hate Jews and the state of Israel, Bachmann said.
“They are people who are dedicated to overthrowing American laws in favor of 7th century Islamic laws of oppression,” she added. “They seek to destroy Judaism and Christianity. They seek to destroy America. Europe is our preview, and Europe’s fate, under Obama will be our own.
“Will we soon witness on our TVs American first-responders cleaning up the blood and flesh carnage of Obama’s obviously dangerous decision?”
AND to bring to bear the catastrophic consequences of said treasonous influx, how many militant Islamic jihadists did it take to tear apart Paris and Brussels in the latest terror attacks?
CASE closed. Indictment sealed.