(How quaint, a “Muslima” enjoys herself at a water theme park…the event stipulates Islamic adherence, effectively, BARRING entrance to “infidels!” No one bats an eye at this outrageous discrimination. Dear readers, what say you?)
MOST non-supremacists recognize that their personal/religious choices cannot be imposed upon the private domain. In other words, religious non-Muslims internalize that strict dress codes may – or may not – disqualify them from employment at certain private (emphasis placed) establishments which have particular marketing images to convey. What part of the word private is lost in the translation? Sheesh.
STILL, for further clarification, imagine the following scenarios and put on your thinking caps: what would drive females dressed in hijabs (who often display utter contempt for those who fail to dress according to Islamic attire, tarring them as whores) to seek employment at trendy and TOTALLY non-modest clothing chains, even if working in the stockroom and not on the sales floor? Huh? Moreover, aren’t private entities entitled to set their own standards for drawing in customers, even if others find it “discriminatory?” To be sure, corp. headquarters have the final say on what goes on in their respective outlets. Remember that.
BESIDES, what about Muslim-owned stores with similarly bent clientage, why not apply there? Not only that, what if we turn the tables: imagine a hot-looking babe in tight jeans, sans hijab, attempting to get a sales job (let’s just suppose that the commissions are so alluring that she just can’t pass up the job opportunity) at a Muslim-owned boutique which only sells Islamic approved clothing. Now, nobody would bat an eye if this clueless female was told: NO CAN DO! After all, they too have a right to hire a “certain look”, whether we agree with it or not.
ON the other hand, if the object of the exercise is NOT primarily gainful employment, but to eventually create said brouhaha to cement into the public’s consciousness that Muslims are the “aggrieved” party, all the better. You see where this is going? And don’t think for a nanosecond that the above proposition is “conspiracy” talk. Wishing doesn’t make it so.
IN this regard, every time you read about Muslim “grievances” (whether activist courts back up their claims is neither here nor there, rather, the Islamic-driven “intent” of the lawsuit is the overriding factor) think about the main objective: Islamic supremacy ala Lawfare via CAIR: Muslim Mafia’s CAIR Via Targeted Lawfare: Another Weapon In Their Supremacist Arsenal.”
AND for much needed visual context, here’s the best rendition of CAIR and its tentacled Brotherhood Mafia:
THUS, it is under said microscope that one must consider what’s what. Please ignore the Orwellian knee-jerk reactions of certain dhimmified Christian and Jewish groups, as they reflexively jump on the “amicus brief” bandwagon for “interfaith” purposes. Clueless schmucks.
What if a job applicant comes to your business in a keffiyeh or a hat with a HAMAS emblem? A Hezbollah emblem? An ISIS emblem? Are you required to hire them–you know, to avoid a costly “religious discrimination” lawsuit filed against you by unindicted HAMAS co-conspirator CAIR with the full cooperation and support of the Obama EEOC? You might be. And, sadly, the Christian Becket Fund and seven Orthodox Jewish groups have filed briefs with the courts in support of Samantha Elauf, a Muslim chick who isn’t really as concerned with the modesty she claims she must have in observance of Islam. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case.
Obama’s EEOC is suing Abercrombie & Fitch on behalf of Elauf, even though the store chain allows Muslim chicks in hijabs to work there and has hired many of them. I have no love for A&F. The store chain, which is now out of fashion favor and behind the fast-fashion times and trends, for years pimped sex, porn, and sleaze in order to sell its wares. I wrote about and protested this for years. But, while it long ago, slinked away from its lowlife marketing, the store continues to have a “Look Policy” on the kinds of people the store will hire. This is a legitimate business purpose, as many stores, just like health clubs, hire people who look like what they want their customers to aspire to. Nobody wants to buy a gym membership from a morbidly obese woman, for example. The “Look Policy” was also used as a reason not to hire Ms. Elauf because the store does not allow employees to wear hats (though it has hired many women in hijabs as noted below, just not her)….read the whole thing….of course, the activist Supreme Court sided with CAIR, after all their noise!!
EVEN more enraging, there is no such thing as fair play within Islamic discourse. None at all. And this is where Islamic supremacy comes in, and their dictates are non-negotiable. Either you submit to Islam’s demands or you die. Period.
POINTEDLY, until they are able to exert full control, Lawfare and such tactics will dominate the public sphere. Nevertheless, guaranteed, it is only a stop-gap measure on their behalf.
BASICALLY, whereas all hell breaks loose if anyone dares to exclude them from private employment or what not, they have ZERO issue with – for all intents and purposes – BARRING others (if they are not dressed “Islamic appropriate”, infidels, you got that?), as evidenced by the following egregious example out of enumerable:
According to Breitbart, the bizarre occurrence is set to take place at Water World in Stoke-on-Trent, England – a water park that boasts nearly half-a-million visitors every year. Oddly enough, this isn’t the water park’s first time obliging the Islamic religion, as they have hosted dozens of “Islamic Fundays” over the past few years.
Their most recent event — sisters only — is set to take place on August 9, 2015. According to the website:
“Our sisters only event is an event restricted to female gender only and boys up to the age of 4 years old. All rides and attractions are open as normal. Clothing during this event must be both culturally and islamically appropriate for the event. There is a designated prayer area located in the reception area. All windows are blacked out with only female staff/lifeguards on duty throughout the night, Female staff will guard the front entrance to make sure that no males enter the facility.”
Yes, you read that right – “Islamically appropriate.”
Although the events don’t necessarily exclude people that aren’t of the Muslim faith from attending, they would be required to follow the strict attire requirements set forth for that day. To ensure you’re not kicked out of the park for wearing something deemed inappropriate, these guidelines were sent out with the invitations:
Dress Code Please ensure that your Awrah [nakedness] is covered at all times. Below are a few suggestions on what you can wear: Top Long Loose T-Shirt/Top. Bottoms Leggings 3 Quarter/Full Length Jogging Bottoms. We would also suggest wearing a leotard under the T-shirt or belt over it as it is likely to float up when you enter the water. A dark-colored T-shirt is recommended as white can become transparent when wet.
So, although you’re not necessarily required to wear a burka, you might as well. That being said, if you think catching a wedgie on the way down a slide is bad in a bathing suit, you should try it in a burka – or maybe not so much…special “dispensation” for the lifeguards, as seen below…
Either way, the problem is excessively clear here — the only religion being granted certain privileges is Islam. Imagine an amusement park wanting to shut everything down because Christians came into town – you know, that brings up an interesting point.
Often times Christians do hold week-long events at amusement parks, but never once have I heard of them turning anyone away, let alone making non-Christians abide by certain rules if they wanted to simply enjoy a day out with the family. In fact, it’s the opposite, they’re more encouraged to come out.
ALAS, let’s stop pussyfooting around. Absolutely, some non-compliant sorts might suggest reverse discrimination is at play, but let’s not quibble.
MIND you, Americans (and other westerners) shouldn’t comfort themselves that because the aforementioned “fun day” act of supremacy (and its concomitant bowing) happened in the UK that their locales are immune. Not at all. Unless, of course, you believe in flying pigs too, then…but we are not done yet.
HOW may realize that America’s turf is their maximum target, in so far as demanding this and that? Well, even uniform dress codes for athletics are not off-limits, that is, if one conforms to Islamic Shariah Law! Headache inducing. Agreed, far too many Americans bow, scrape, comply and then some! Where is their personal and national pride?
New sports uniforms have been created for Somali Muslim immigrants who refuse to assimilate into American culture and believe that American girls and women dress like whores.
Sihal Ali is a point guard for her Cedar-Riverside community basketball team. But her long skirt and traditional headbag made scoring points difficult. “I wouldn’t be able to do moves or anything because of my skirt and every time I run my wrap will keep falling.”
That all changed with a new sharia-compliant sports uniform designed for them and by them with the help of the University of Minnesota Design School and the Tucker Center for Research on Girls and Women in Sport.
The new uniform features leggings, a long tunic and tighter hijab, which Ali says is perfect for her. “I don’t even have to focus about what I’m wearing. I just play the game,” Ali said.
The uniforms were sewn by members of the community and the girls voted for a red uniform. With “extra grant money” (from whom?), they made a second uniform featuring blue and black.
INHERENTLY, is America turning herself inside out to accede with Islamic dictates or not? If the answer is in the affirmative, when will enough be enough? You decide.
AS if one submissive indignity heaped upon another is not outrageous enough…
WHAT about the latest diet coke brouhaha ala “flying while Muslim”, and all the risks incurred thereof?
What is behind her bogus claim of “Islamophobic” victimhood begins to come clear in this context. “‘Diet Coke’ Muslim Discrimination Passenger Has Ties to Radical Imams,” by Jordan Schachtel,Breitbart, June 1, 2015:
A Muslim woman who claimed over the weekend–in a social media post that has since gone viral–that United Airlines discriminated against her because of her faith, has a history rife with deep connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Imams.
31-year-old Tahera Ahmad, who serves as the Muslim chaplain at Northwestern University, claimed over the weekend that she was discriminated against because a United Airlines flight attendant allegedly refused to give her a full can of unopened Diet Coke. When asked for an explanation as to why she had been refused her unopened Diet Coke, the flight attendant allegedly told her that the Coke can could be used as a “weapon on the plane,” Ahmad stated in a Facebook post. After she complained, a passenger told her, “You Moslem you need to shut the f—k up,” according to Ahmad’s recounting of what happened on board. Ahmad’s Facebook page was taken down this afternoon.
Islamic supremacist groups such as CAIR (Council on American-Islamic relations) have condemned United, telling Al Jazeera that they have taken an interest in filing a lawsuit on behalf of Ahmad.
Ahmad’s claims of discrimination have not been corroborated by any passengers, and United Airlines rejects that any wrongdoing or acts of discrimination occurred.
United Airlines released a statement that the flight attendant “attempted several times to accommodate Ms. Ahmad’s beverage request.” However, her post has since gone viral, with many calling for a boycott of United Airlines due to its alleged mistreatment of Ahmad.
Ahmad has shown to have an affinity for radical Islamist groups that seek to employ deceptive tactics in order to advance Sharia law, Breitbart News has found. Ahmad has attended and participated in multiple conferences over the past couple years which were hosted by alleged Muslim Brotherhood front groups. She has also proudly written about, and has happily posed in photos with radical Imams.
One month earlier, Ahmad posted a picture to Facebook of her standing next to Suhaib Webb, who is the Imam of the Islamic Society of Boston, an outfit run under the same umbrella organization as the mosque attended by Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and a plethora of other convicted terrorists. Webb has a demonstrated history of radical connections, including him being a close confidant of Al Qaeda mastermind Anwar al Awlaki prior to the 9/11 attacks.
Ahmad is “well-known” to Yasir Qadhi, a cleric who she has frequently invited to speak to the student body at Northwestern. An audio tape of one of Qadhi’s sermons revealed that he once called for Muslims to wage holy war against non-Muslims. During his speech, Qadhi went on to discuss how he did not believe that the Holocaust had ever occurred.
In April 2014, Ahmad joined an MPAC (Muslim Public Affairs Council) delegation of American Muslim women, who partnered with the White House “to host a historic forum recognizing the contributions of American Muslim women.” MPAC, like the MAS and ICNA, was originally founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The group has in the past endorsed a paper that rejects the designations of Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations. In 2009, the group hosted a protest where demonstrators called for the annihilation of the State of Israel.
In 2013, she recited the Quran at the annual ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention. Declassified FBI documents found that the Bureau regarded ISNA as a Muslim Brotherhood front group. The FBI also found that ISNA was founded by prominent members of the global Muslim Brotherhood organization. Ahmad’s bio states that she has “supported leadership for premier Muslim organizations including [ISNA].”
Although she has an extensive record of supporting radical Islamist groups, Ahmad was recognized by the Obama White House as a leading “Muslim female in the United States,” according to a release from her University. She is a frequent Ramadan dinner attendee at the White House, according to the report.”
TRUTH dare be told, for an authentic bird’s-eye view, let’s read what a passenger sitting near the “victim” had to say: “Fellow Passenger Claims Diet Coke Muslim Tahera Ahmad Is A Rude Liar.”
MOST urgently, it must be verbalized that the actual implantation of Shariah Law is their end point. However, Islamic proponents are duly cognizant (have been apprised via one on one discussions with a handful of their mouthpieces, but only after they finish threatening this and that, dictating, shut the hell up!) that a “phase by phase” plan inside America is their best option. Yes, they are duly aware that this Allah-driven (and political) project can take years.
REGARDLESS, never mind all the sticking points. The fact of the matter is, effectively, America (even though not the law of the land-yet) is bowing and catering to Shariah Law dictates. In and of itself, this is a huge victory. Incontrovertibly, they view a total capitulation as their “divine” right, one that is granted by the “power” of Allah!
INDEED, they never imagined that their inroads would happen as swiftly as they did. Therefore, they are more than hopeful that their heretofore timeline, to bring America into Shariah Law’s full orbit, is closer than ever. Indeed, they reflexively intone, insha’Allah…إن شاء الله…
IN a nutshell, tragically, this Muslim Brotherhood expert affirms that they have more than ample reason to revel in their upped timeline. Bow after bow…submission after submission…