THERE is no better evidence that DEI hires are dangerous in the extreme than when planes cease to function safely — not to mention all of the other professional standards that have collapsed, that is, since its stealth-like inception.
- Conservative influencer asks United Airlines one tough question, and the answer could blow up US aviation…
- What Happens When A Whistleblower Dumps Boeing’s Secrets?
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion has no place in medicine
INDEED, when the highest court in the land joins the aforementioned bandwagon, well, the damage is unthinkable. Unimaginable.
WELL, not to be a nitpicker; a contrarian; a non-PC knuckle-dragger, or the like, it is entirely the case that sans the evisceration of DEI in toto America (western civilization) will collapse. Stick a fork in it…..
IN plain-speak, its poisonous effects are completely/deeply rooted within U.S. academia.
BACK to the menace in robes: Ketanji Jackson!
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
WND | By Bob Unruh | March 19, 2024
Laments ‘harmful information’ available to public
The arguments before the Supreme Court this week over a case challenging the Biden administration’s collusion with tech companies to censor the ideas and messages that he doesn’t like has revealed one justice holding a stunning perspective.
She’s worried that the First Amendment, which was written to hamstring the government from censoring ideas, messages and speech, hamstrings the government’s agenda to censor ideas, messages and speech.
Further, it demanded the suppression of alternative treatments that have proven in many cases to be effective.
Jackson told lawyers representing those whose ideas were censored: “So can you help me? Because I’m really – I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
A report at Fox News reported, “Social media users were shocked and slightly bemused” at her perspective on the First Amendment, which specifically bans government censoring ideas and speech.
The case, Murthy v. Missouri, has plaintiffs challenging Biden’s administration’s alleged coordination with Big Tech to censor certain messages.
Fox reported the case stemmed from a lawsuit “brought by Republican-led states Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with social media companies ‘under the guise of combating misinformation’ that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks — which the states argued was a First Amendment violation.”
One problem is that some of what the Biden administration claimed was “misinformation” actually was accurate, and some of what it claimed was accurate actually was “misinformation.”
The report said Jackson appeared to suggest the government can violate the First Amendment in some circumstances.
Fox and Friends Weekends co-host Will Cain confirmed, “Hamstringing the government is THE POINT of the First Amendment!”
And California state Rep. Bill Essayli, in the report, confirmed, “That’s literally the point of the Bill of Rights. The government’s powers derive from, and are subservient to, the rights of the People.”
“I would be more concerned if the First Amendment did not hamstring the government in significant ways,” said Reason senior editor Robby Soave.
And, Fox said, podcaster Tim Pool turned blunt: “This is not funny This lady is dangerous.”
“WOW. The person who doesn’t know what a woman is, also doesn’t know what the First Amendment is,” The Libs of TikTok account posted on social media. The social media influencer cited Jackson’s refusal to answer, during her confirmation hearing, what is a woman is.
The report noted, Tim Young, a comedian, explained, “The same justice who doesn’t know what a woman is … doesn’t understand what the First Amendment was written for…Does this come as a shock to anyone?”
“Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey told Fox News Digital Jackson was ‘absolutely right’ about the First Amendment restricting the government,” the report said.
“It is hamstringing, and it’s supposed to. The whole purpose of the Constitution is to protect us from the government, and the government exists to protect our rights. But here, the federal government is ignoring our First Amendment protections and weaponizing the federal government to silence our voices,” Bailey said.
continue reading here….
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
{ADDENDUM: Bear uppermost in mind — To stifle the truth-telling found at this site, FB’s censors have “zeroed-out” all of my articles via their “Boom and Ban” censors ala their ubiquitous “Community Standards” — as they hunt me up and down the internet like rabid dogs to their prey! No kidding. This is just some of FB’s modus operandi, what is now deemed their “love notes” to yours truly:This URL goes against our Community Standards on spam:adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.comACTIVITY
About your post Today at 4:34 PM: No one else can see your post.And so on and so forth. In fact, just recently, each article at my “parent site”, ADINA KUTNICKI: A ZIONIST & CONSERVATIVE BLOG, had its FB registered shares go from the hundreds, with some up to the many thousands, to a big, fat ZERO. In other words, all my shares have gone down the rabbit hole. Just like that. Poof. Gone. As such, take it to the bank that each and every conservative voice which reaches a wide readership will, sooner than later, be CENSORED. MUTED.} MESSAGE FAILED: This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems. If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}
Adina Kutnicki 