Hillary’s Benghazigate Stonewall: Will She Or Won’t She Testify? That IS The Question…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those of us blessed to have children – sons or daughters, or a combination of both – understand what it feels like to be stonewalled. Whether they are in grade school, high school, studying at university or totally flown from the coop, parents (especially moms…and Jewish ones at that!) have a visceral ‘need to know’.

But those who learn their lessons well also know when the time has come to mind their own business, thereby, keeping parental noses clear of matters no longer within their purview. And parents who are especially astute also recognize their offspring’s signals, understanding which topics are truly off limits. Yours truly has been down that road, more times than she cares to admit to.

So, where is the connection between family intrigues and Hill’s part in Benghazigate with all its attendant twists and turns? Closer than you can imagine.

The brazen lengths which Hill has gone to – to keep herself immunized/neutralized from Benghazigate – are beyond any parent’s wildest imagination, even the most ‘creative’ types who also cross many boundaries to satisfy their ‘need to know’. But the Sec of State doesn’t have the luxury of NOT spilling the beans, as she is accountable to ‘The People’, unlike ones children who are ultimately accountable to themselves, especially when grown.

And not unlike little children who swear up and down that their sticky fingers haven’t been in the cookie jar – yet the evidence is smeared all over their adorable faces – Hill can’t get a ‘sick’ note, thus claiming this or that belly ache. For crying out loud. Fess up.

Yet this blogger understands very well why she is punting every which way, hoping to escape her punishment, alongside her wayward, criminal-bent boss. 

And even some leftist media types are having a hard time keeping a lid on the most explosive scandal in U.S. history - adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/11/benghazigates-truths-ensnaring-some-leftist-media-admitting-that-qadaffis-main-beneficiary-is-al-qaeda-addendum-to-benghazigates-stink-bombs-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. It’s that hot.

The more incendiary the bombs, which creep to the fore, renders the players more desperate - adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/29/benghazigates-stink-bombs-steadily-creeping-to-the-fore-regardless-of-the-regimes-spinmeisters-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/Dangerous too.

So, the entrance of CIA Director Petraeus via his downfall raises the stakes to the nth degree -  adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/27/benghazigates-petraeus-testimony-will-ensnare-the-potus-his-gang-addendum-to-covering-up-benghazigate-exquisite-political-timing-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …and Hill, the consummate political operator, knows what this portends. The besmirched General has little to lose.

Adding to her heartburn – oh, does she deserve it – is the knowledge that gal pal, Huma Abedin will be dragged in too - adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/07/spotlight-on-huma-abedin-islamist-infiltration-in-washington-arabmuslim-world-turning-up-the-heat-via-bengazigate-addendum-to-hillary-takes-the-fall-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-sp/ …when Benghazigate hits critical mass. Not only will she be ensnared in this gargantuan criminal cover up, but other skeletons will tumble out as well. Karma can be a bitch.

‘Hillary’s fortuitous fall from her Benghazi Stonewall’

by  on DECEMBER 15, 2012 in BLOGGENERAL

The alleged fainting spell and subsequent concussion of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears a bit fortuitous, if not downright suspicious when factoring in all of her stonewalling and obfuscation to this point.

It all started on September 16th, when U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice – instead of Hillary – appeared on five Sunday talk shows to give demonstrably false information about the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Rice said in an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams that the reason Hillary ‘declined to do it’was because the Secretary of State was too tired after a ‘grueling week’.

On November 30th, when Hillary was asked why Rice appeared on those shows instead of her, the Secretary of State responded that she wouldn’t answer a “hypothetical” about what could have happened.

No, she really said that (at the :37 mark):

Even MSNBC’s resident RINO, Joe Scarborough could see right through this one. Start watching at the 2:40 mark when the Morning Joe Crew airs a snippet of Rice’s interview with Williams but pay more attention to Scarborough’s reaction afterward. He is convinced that the reason Hillary didn’t do those shows was because of a political calculation, not because of fatigue.

“The greatest study on the source of all evil. How to identify evil even when it is cloaked in “righteousness” click her for more information.”

Before moving on, time for another illustration of what Scarborough was talking about, via Jim Carrey, who represents Susan Rice in this metaphor:

Back to Hillary…

On October 2nd, the House Oversight Committee sent Hillary a letter asking for answers about why requests for security at the Benghazi consulate were ignored. Her response?

Ignore the letter.

On November 1st, the House Oversight Committee sent Hillary another letter,asking about documents that had come into the possession of the Committee which showed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and officials at the consulate were very concerned about their security on the day of the attack. Her response?

Ignore the letter.

“Unsung Davids”, a new and powerful book tells the story of ten modern-day heroes who fought tyranny and evil but are given little or no recognition. One of those men actually did battle with Hillary Clinton. Click Here for more details.

In early November, it was reported that Hillary declined to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the 15th of that month because she would be in Australia.

Via PJM:

“She was asked to appear at House Foreign Affairs next week, and we have written back to the chairman to say that she’ll be on travel next week,” said department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. She did not answer a question about whether Clinton would be willing to fly back from Australia to address either the Foreign Affairs panel or the Senate and House closed-door intelligence committee hearings getting to the root of the Benghazi scandal.

On December 10th, it was reported that Hillary would be canceling her trip to the Middle East due to a stomach virus. Three days later, it was reported early in the day that she would be testifying in front of the Senate and House foreign relations committee on December 20th. Later in the day, it appeared that Clinton was backing away from testifying because the Accountability Review Board (ARB) had not completed its report and probably wouldn’t by the 20th.

Via Foreign Policy:

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said today that the ARB is not complete, might not be complete by Dec. 20, and Clinton has not agreed to testify on Dec. 20.

“The Hill has talked about a planning date on the calendar. That presumes that the ARB is finished,” Nuland said. “That’s dependent on all of the work getting done between now and then… The ARB is continuing to do its work, to my knowledge it has not yet completed its work.”

Clinton has agreed to brief the House and Senate foreign relations committees on how she interprets the ARB report, whenever it surfaces.

In the wake of this equivocating, pressure was no doubt applied to the State Department by committee members. For one thing, they announced that Hillary would testify because the date was on the State Department’s calendar. For another thing, committee members insisted that they have access to the ARB report despite Nuland’s claims that all Hillary could agree to was to include Congress in her response to the ARB report. None of that includes how frustrated many committee members are by how long Clinton and the State Department have been stonewalling.

Then, on the morning of December 15th, Hillary faints as a consequence of her stomach virus and gets a concussion.

Via Foreign Policy:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won’t testify to Congress next week on Benghazi, after fainting and suffering a concussion Saturday and due to her ongoing stomach ailment.

“While suffering from a stomach virus, Secretary Clinton became dehydrated and fainted, sustaining a concussion,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines said in a statement. “She has been recovering at home and will continue to be monitored regularly by her doctors. At their recommendation, she will continue to work from home next week, staying in regular contact with Department and other officials. She is looking forward to being back in the office soon.”

Deputy Secretaries of State Bill Burns and Tom Nides will both testify in Clinton’s place, according to the office of Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA).

Note how suddenly the readiness of the ARB report is no longer an issue. Bill Burns and Tom Nides are about to assume the same position that Susan Rice did on September 16th and isn’t it interesting that they’ll apparently be doing it whether the ARB report is completed or not.

One day before Clinton’s fortuitous fall, Fox News’ Chris Stirewalt wrote the following:

Clinton can hardly leave her post before a replacement is confirmed, so her goal is to keep the Benghazi business from damaging her valedictory weeks at Foggy Bottom.

It’s a tricky task, but as Rice learned and Obama has been taught again, Clinton is not someone to be underestimated.

Perhaps, but  a concussion caused by passing out from a stomach virus days before she was set to testify?!

Before sending Rice out to do the talking, Hillary was apparently too tired to do it herself. Now, before sending Burns and Nides out to do the talking, she has a virus that caused her to fall on her head.

One thing should be very, very obvious. Hillary Clinton does not want to talk about Benghazi.

Why?”

shoebat.com/2012/12/15/hillarys-fortuitous-fall-from-her-benghazi-stonewall/

And the more dirt uncovered re State’s part in the Mid East hell fire – with the full sanction/blessings of the Commander-in-Chief – the harder Hill will fight to keep herself from burning within. 

‘BENGHAZI REVIEW FINDS SYSTEMATIC SECURITY FAULTS’

BY MATTHEW LEE
ASSOCIATED PRESS-hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_US_LIBYA_ATTACKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-12-18-21-20-30

Patriots, squeeze your reps like never before….they are positioning themselves to find a ‘no-fault’ action against any and all. So, inundate their Capitol Hill offices as if your lives depend on it…until Hill has nowhere to run…nowhere to hide….the POTUS too. 

The mightier they are the harder they fall…faster…faster…

About these ads

5 thoughts on “Hillary’s Benghazigate Stonewall: Will She Or Won’t She Testify? That IS The Question…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Hillary has been the principal puppet. The puppet master cut the string to puppet Rice since confirmation questioning would have focused on Benghazi, too. He can’t cut the string on the Hillary puppet. If Congress does its job it will call in the puppet master and nail him on perjury. He needs to be locked up first – then all his puppets can be herded into an adjacent cell – Hillary, Holder, the bunch.

  2. Hillary is going to do her darnedest to get out of testifying. And she won’t mind lying once she does finally testify. She lied during the Clinton administration about Whitewater, missing FBI files, the “vast right wing conspiracy”, Vince Foster and I don’t remember what else. She’s never going to practice law again and she won’t suffer any penalty even if she is caught in perjury, so why should she tell the truth if the truth will hurt her image? Cynical, I know, but I’ve been Clinton watching since 1992.

  3. Pingback: Benghazigate’s Practiced Liars…Via A Long & Bloody History…Addendum To: The Nexus Between Cover Ups…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  4. Pingback: Hillary’s Fall & Its Surrounding Mystery…Why ALL The Secrecy & Disjointed Info?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  5. Pingback: Benghazigate’s Indictment – Of An Islamist-in-Chief – Supported By Retired Four Star Admiral…Other Heavyweights Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s