There is a world of difference between individuals who engage in “white lies” (though an attempt to suppress the urge is a laudable goal), and people who habitually tell tall tales.
Besides, is there anyone who hasn’t told their loved one ( especially men to their wives/girlfriends ) that they look good in this or that, preferring not to insult their feelings? Personally, would rather be told the truth before heading out in public – only suffering momentary embarrassment – but many prefer to see what they want to see. As is said, different strokes for different folks; beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and really only skin deep.
Be that as it may, in relation to the leader of the free world, there is NO higher commodity – when electing a leader – than their ability to tell the truth. This dare not be confused with leaking national secrets (and most conveniently), sacrificed on the altar of “transparency”. The POTUS has a penchant for such “truth telling”, and he is aided and abetted by media lapdogs. A perversion of truth and patriotism…traits wholly absent in the Obama regime.
Tragic….and herein lies the crux. This blog is rife with supportive evidence which attests to the Radical-in-Chief’s inability to relate to – thereby value – truthfulness. Character? What’s that? Moral compass? Just for chumps.
Starting with his “down low” lifestyle; coupled with his revolutionary friendships, from knee high to a grasshopper; exhibited through his 4 year wreckage of “transformation and change”; few can argue that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is anything, but an anti-American fraud - http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/03/the-down-low-potus-and-rev-wrights-guiding-hand-trinity-churchs-many-secrets-stripped-naked-addendum-to-mysterious-deaths-never-far-from-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutn/. An exceedingly dangerous man.
So, atop the wreckage already visible, more keeps piling up. Does this Poser-in-Chief even know how to step off his merry-go-round of lies, even if the situation warrants him to? Have no idea. Regardless, he can spin, weave, bob and dodge – like liars always do – but many are hot on his trail, thanks to fellow bloggers and alternative media types. Enter…the latest charge sheets:
Still believe Obama got Osama ? Think again - http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/hey-obama-didnt-get-bin-laden/. The following are some more fact checks exposing the Liar-in-Chief:
‘FACT CHECK: LABOR SECRETARY SOLIS MISLEADS ON JOBS REVISIONS’
“Suspicion about the federal government’s September jobs report has fallen on Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, who appeared on CNBC this morning and defended the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), claiming–falsely–that upward revisions of 86,000 jobs were from the private sector. In fact, the new number is entirely accounted for by upwards revisions to state and federal government payrolls.
The BLS reported that while only 114,000 jobs were created in September–which would have translated into a rise in unemployment from 8.1% to 8.2%–the unemployment rate fell dramatically to 7.8%. That unusual drop is the fastest in nearly three decades, and was unexpected even in the rosiest predictions. One reason for the rise was an upward revision of 86,000 to the July and August jobs numbers–all of which came from a 91,000 increase in the estimate of public sector jobs. Private sector job estimates were actually revised downward by 5,000. In addition, the BLS reported a large rise in the number of part-time jobs, adding 600,000 jobs to the total–a dramatic increase of 7.5%, not explained by any other economic indicators–and raising questions about whether the government had changed the way it counted part-time workers. Solis was adamant today in defending both the revisions and the BLS’s methodology for counting part-time workers–relying largely on the upwards revisions for July and August jobs (emphasis added):
CNBC: We’re getting bombarded by people who do not believe the number. They believe this number was fixed and typed to coincide with Election Day. What do you say to them?…I’ll rephrase the question. A lot of people do not believe the 7.8 number. They believe that somehow BLS fixed this to coincide with the election cycle. What is labor’s response? Solis: You know, I’m insulted when I hear that because we have a very professional, civil service organization where you have top, top economists that work at the BLS. They’ve been doing these calculations. These are — these are our best trained and best-skilled individuals working in the BLS, and it’s really ludicrous to hear that kind of statement, and I say that because just look at the – we have to look at what happens across the board, not just in one month, but look what happened in the last two months. We also saw revisions there upwards of 86,000 additional jobs added and this brings us now to 5.2 million private sector jobs across the board, we saw 104 private sector jobs created…. CNBC: Before I let you go, you say skepticism over the numbers are ludicrous. You say you’re insulted. Is there a danger, you believe, when large sections was country don’t believe the data. Not that it’s ever been considered gospel, but when you have disbelief how much danger is embedded in that? Solis: I will tell you that we look at each report differently. We just saw revisions for the last two months and this happens. I mean, these are estimates that obviously, the BLS puts out. They do the best calculation, using the best measurements and tools and we’ve been using them for the past 70 years. We haven’t changed anything and the information that I received is given to me by our professional, civil service staff in the BLS.
Note that Solis describes the 86,000 upward revision as if it were an increase in private sector jobs, though in fact the increase came entirely from revisions to public sector payrolls by cash-strapped federal and state governments. Instead of shedding jobs, as previously claimed, governments have been adding jobs.”
This too via Canada Free Press, re the fudging of the numbers-
‘Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS & Parkinson’s Law’ - http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50146.
Knowing a thing or two about what happens to regular folks who cook their financial books ( see http://adinakutnicki.com/about/ ), and the iron fist brought down by the IRS when caught ( except, if one supports Islamic or leftist causes, but let’s not digress… ), what should be the penalty for the most lawbreaking regime in U.S. history?
Let the citizens decide.
NOT only that, but the same lawbreakers who trot out the Sec of Labor to tell financial tall tales, are the same deviants who abuse the weight of the IRS for their personal vendettas – see - WND EXCLUSIVE -’COLUMBIA CLASSMATE: OBAMA USING IRS TO PUNISH ME’ - Outspoken 2008 VP candidate claims prez trying to ‘silence critics’ -http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/columbia-classmate-obama-using-irs-to-punish-me/.
Moreover, with all the lies swirling around the Thief-in-Chief, and his most recent miraculous job numbers, one can be forgiven if ‘PaytoPlay’ – Chicago’s own version of a “political mafia” – got lost in the shuffle. Have no fear. There are those who keep abreast.
‘Hugo Floriani, Investigative Reporter, Illinois PaytoPlay’
“Previous Illinois PaytoPlay (IP2P) articles have proposed that the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO), once led by former U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, timed the arrest of former Governor Rod “Blago” Blagojevich in order to prevent persons representing Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. from paying a bribe to Blago in exchange for Blago appointing J.J., Jr. as the new U.S. Senator for the seat vacated by recently-elected President Barack Obama.
A recent article in World Net Daily, written by best-selling author Jerome Corsi entitled “Jesse Jackson, Wright ‘arranged’ Obama marriage,” adds credibility to what IP2P has alleged; namely,that the timing of Blago’s arrest was not motivated by a desire to stop a “crime spree,” but was meant to save J.J., Jr., from being complicit in the crime associated with purchasing a Senate seat. The primary assertion of Corsi’s article is this: “As a young single woman, Michelle Robinson was a fixture in the home of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, who along with Rev. Jeremiah Wright ‘arranged’ her marriage to Barack Obama, according to sources in Chicago who know the couple. ‘If you want to understand Michelle Obama, you’ve got to go back to Jesse Jackson, a woman called “Robyn” for this article told WND. Robyn, who spent several years working for Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition, explained to a WND investigator in Chicago that Michelle Obama ‘just about grew up in Jesse Jackson’s home.’ ‘Jesse should have charged her rent and board for the amount of time she spent in his home instead of her own,’ she said.”
This article is the second in a series. In the first installment, Corsi claimed that Obama was part of an “underground subculture in the black community known as Down Low, comprised largely of men who secretly engage in homosexual activity while living ‘straight’ lives in public.” And, that Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church was a facilitation center for this underground subculture.
Putting that assertion aside, the close relationship between Michelle Robinson and the Jackson family adds weight to IP2P’s suggestion that the newly elected President would have taken all necessary steps to protect J.J., Jr., who was not only the Co-Chair of his Presidential Campaign Committee, but also a member of a family with a long and close personal relationship with Michelle Obama.
Then there’s also the possibility that J.J., Jr. would be knowledgeable of Barack Obama’s alleged involvement in the “Down Low” community.” http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/10/05/as-obamas-cover-story-comes-down-the-curtain-goes-up-on-the-usaos-cover-up-of-j-j-jr-s-role-in-the-blago-story/.
Oh no…the “down low” saga keeps bubbling to the fore. Can’t keep the truth from rearing its ugly head. Sick and tired…of being sick and tired? Not done yet.
Do you recall this commentary on “Uncle Frank”, and his noteworthy influence on the Prez? No worries. Here’s a recap - http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/.
Onto “The One’s” latest shenanigans…
‘WHY WAS OBAMA‘S AUDIO BOOK VERSION OF ’DREAMS FROM MY FATHER’ PURGED OF ALL REFERENCES TO COMMUNIST MENTOR?’
“You might recall TheBlaze’s series of reports on Dr. Paul Kengor’s powerful book, “The Communist,” which offered a detailed account of the Communist Party ties of President Obama’s longtime mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.
“Frank,” as he is referred to in Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father,” is mentioned multiple times in the print edition of the president’s book, however, Kengor now reveals that all references to “Frank” were purged from the volume’s abridged audio version. It’s an observation that was first broached, albeit very briefly, by Jack Cashill in a July article. And since then, the scrubbing has gone unnoticed.
Until now. “Frank” — whose influence Kengor asserts was key to the fledgling politician and that the eccentric activist appears in “each mile-marker” of Obama’s path from Hawaii to the halls of Washington, D.C. — is mentioned no less than 22 times by name in “Dreams From My Father” and is referenced via pronouns numerous other times throughout the book. But while listening to the audio version recently, Kengor noticed “Frank” had disappeared. He re-listened to the entire audio book on Tuesday afternoon and compared it to the unabridged memoir. “Every reference to ‘Frank’ everywhere in the book, from every section—and there are many of them—are gone,” Kengor told TheBlaze in an email. The omissions are important because a review of the Random House website reveals that all audio versions of “Dreams,” along with Obama’s subsequent book, “The Audacity of Hope,” are only available in the abridged format.
While the Obama campaign could certainly argue that during the editing process many excerpts, not just the ones referencing Frank, were eliminated from the audio version for brevity, some might find it odd that such an important figure in the president’s life would have been relegated to the cutting room floor. It is also important to note that the audio version of “Dreams” was released in 2005, shortly after Obama’s now-infamous 2004 speech at the Democratic National Convention — a speech which made it fairly clear that the aspiring politician would indeed rise to prominence on the national stage one day.
Back in 1994, when the original text version of “Dreams” was released, Obama was a relative “nobody,” hence his memoir, complete with references to a seemingly obscure character named “Frank” would hardly have been on the public’s radar. Given that the president himself narrated the audio version of “Dreams,” approved the final edits and even won a Grammy award for his efforts leaves little room for doubt that Obama is aware, if not directly responsible, for the omissions.
In turn, the fact that the audio book appears to have been sanitized of the myriad references to Obama’s controversial mentor strikes Kengor as being in no way coincidental. “It’s amazing to read along the text as you listen to the audio, and see and hear everything word for word, paragraph after paragraph, line after line, page after page, and then suddenly—wham, boom!—it skips a paragraph or line or page that just happened to mention “Frank” in the original,” Kengor added. It’s almost creepy, chilling to see……..”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/why-would-obamas-audio-book-version-of-dreams-from-my-father-have-been-purged-of-all-references-to-communist-mentor/….read the whole thing…once upon a (book’s) time there was an “Uncle Frank”….and suddenly…erased. Beyond creepy.
Whoppers are fungible, until they no longer are. They always have a way of ensnaring the culprits, but not always in time to save the victims. In this regard, the Liar-in-Chief is running the biggest criminal enterprise in U.S. history. Way past time to uproot him and his (all too eager) surrogates.
Revenge never smelled so sweet.