Israel’s Leadership Self-Abasement & Its Bloody Knock-On Effects: Arab-Israeli Military Jihad. What’s Going On? What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


TRUTH dare be told, JEWISH self-abasement ties DIRECTLY into domestic Military Jihad igniting within Israel. In particular, Jerusalem, its capital, as well as Judea and Samaria, Israel’s heartland, are on fire. They are Israel’s Arabs main targets – for now. No doubt, the rest of the country will feel its knock-on effects. Yes, the Third Intifada is exploding!

NOW, being on the ground in Israel – and in touch with certain folks whose boots are operating inside and outside officialdom, most recently, through a lengthy conference call re said situation….aka the ‘matzav’…מַצָּב – it has been confirmed that the following analysis is spot on. Yet, none (for various reasons) would go on the record attesting to the same. Regardless, the unspoken word was: Get the truth out! 


YET, before we proceed, the following private message is decidedly noteworthy, even though this Israeli – a highly respected and veteran defense-related journalist – was not part of the aforementioned conference call. Nevertheless, this is what he said, regarding Israel’s leadership, in relation to the stepped up Military Jihad from the domestic fifth column:

ביבי ממשיך לחלק ראיונות בארהב…מאופר ומסורק…וכאן רוצחים יהודים…זה יופי של סידור עבודה…..האמת היא שגם שהוא כאן הוא לא מביא הרבה תועלת….למעשה אפס תועלת…אז תשאר שם עוד שבועיים …אולי בלעדיך מישהו יזיז את התחת ויטפל בטרור …מעולם לא היתה בישראל ממשלה של אימפוטנטים כאלה……מאיפה אספו אותם

FOR those who require a translation from the Hebrew message:

While Bibi continues to divide himself between boastful (US) interviews, here (in Israel) they are murdering Jews….a great working arrangement (for the enemy)…the truth is that even if he was in Israel it would hardly result in any benefit…actually, zero benefit,…so, let him stay there (in the US) another 2 weeks…perhaps, without him here someone will move their ass and deal with the terror….never has there been such an impotent government such as this….from where do we find such leaders???

AGAIN, this is from someone whose professional perch revolves around analyzing the defense establishment. The political leadership alike. Them’s fighting words…

REGARDLESS, too many (inside and outside Israel) appear totally perplexed by the ‘sudden’ outbreak of Military Jihad within Israel, as if it came like a ‘bolt out of the blue.’ Newsflash: Not only was it expected, it was announced in advance! 

WITHOUT a doubt, Abbas, Arafat’s terror protégé, Israel’s putative ‘peace partner’ – the PA’s main mouthpiece address – green-lighted the start of ‘renewed’ Military Jihad. In fact, the ever cautious and knee-bent Anti-Defamation League (terrified to anger powerful Arabist forces in Washington, as well as their leftist power base) couldn’t help but put out a statement, relative to the orchestrated Military Jihad plaguing Israel:

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas implicitly gave the green light for renewed violence against Israeli civilians with a wink and a nod” during his U.N. address last week, setting in motion the string of Palestinian attacks against Israelis over the past week, the Anti-Defamation League said on Sunday.

Abbas’ more incendiary comments centered around the Palestinian leader’s threats to cease cooperating with Israel under the framework of previous agreements, such as the Oslo Accords struck by his predecessor, Yasser Arafat, as well as his refusal to acknowledge Jewish links to the religion’s holiest city of Jerusalem, where an attack by a Palestinian left two Jewish Israelis dead on Saturday.(On Thursday night, Eitam and Naama Henkin were killed in cold blood by Palestinian terrorists who drove by their car and riddled them with bullets. The incident would have caught the attention of the Israeli public in any case. But the fact that the couple was gunned down in front of their four children — aged 9 and under, with the youngest being a 6-month-old baby — made the attack that much more heart-wrenching.)

“The attacks by Palestinian terrorist groups in the West Bank and Jerusalem come just days after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’s highly inflammatory speech at the United Nations, where he called the Oslo Accords defunct and denied the Jewish connection to Jerusalem, among other spurious claims,” declared ADL National Director Jonathan Greenblatt.

SAY it ain’t so….and this statement was made before said Military Jihad took the lives of additional Jews on Sunday, Oct. 4:

Jerusalem, or at least the area around the Old City, has become something of a war zone over the past few days.

In at least two separate attacks, two Israelis have been knifed to death, a Jewish toddler has been stabbed, and several more people have been wounded for no other reason than walking in certain areas while being Jewish.

And how have Israel’s peace partners in the Palestinian Authority responded? By blaming Israel, naturally.

When a 19-year-old Palestinian man mercilessly killed two Israeli men, critically wounded the wife of one of the victims and stabbed their helpless 2-year-old child near Lions’ Gate on Saturday, he was shot and killed by soldiers responding to the scene.

Similarly, when another knife-wielding terrorist stabbed and seriously injured a 15-year-old Israeli near Damascus Gate on Sunday, he, too, was gunned down to prevent any further bloodshed.

The statement released by the Palestinian Authority in the wake of these attacks insisted that the “killing of two young men in occupied Jerusalem” was part and parcel of Israel’s “policy of escalation.” The regime of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas urgently called upon the international community to intervene against Israel.

NOT only that, this site reported (most recently, on two separate occasions, and throughout these pages) on a critical component that fuels Military Jihad, one which is entirely within Israel’s decision-making echelon to adjust and correct. To their eternal shame, certain truths are considered verboten in Israel’s chattering classes. Resultant, due to the power that said elitists have over Israel’s political echelon, their strategic calculi, such that it is, produces horrific knock-on effects; exploding Jewish body parts! Indeed, more of the same can be found within ‘ISIS & The Israeli Arab Nexus: How Did This Happen & What Can Be Done?’, in tandem with ‘Israel’s Appeasement Gone Wild: Jews Arrested For ‘Upsetting’ Arabs!’

GRANTED, one may rightfully inquire: What the hell does the above have to do with Jewish self-abnegation and its knock-on effects relative to Military Jihad? Everything.

IT is a given that groveling for ‘peace’ is a recipe for disaster, especially in the fiery Mid East where ‘strong horses rule.’ And the fact that Israel has the strongest military in the region makes matters worse. For if a leadership is terrified to use its military might to crush those who seek nothing less than their national destruction, what message does that send to the enemy within and outside its borders? If interested, this topic has been fully analyzed within a global interview, and it can be found here.  

MORE pointedly, the very fact that it is considered nothing short of ‘incitement’ to utter the words, ‘Kahane Was Right’, attests to why a continuously apologetic, abject, yes, self-abasing leadership is a recipe for national disaster. Concomitantly, Jewish victory is equated with the plague!

AND for those who want a brief introduction to what Rabbi Meir Kahane, z”l stood for, the following is a basic encapsulation:

  • AHAVAT YISROEL – Love of Jewry
  • HADAR – Dignity and Pride
  • BARZEL – Iron (Fist)
  • MISHMAAT YISROEL – Jewish discipline and unity
  • BITACHON – Faith in the indestructibility of the Jewish people

MOST significantly, he was continually persecuted and prosecuted while living in Israel, all for the ‘crime’ of speaking (as a private citizen, as well as a member of the Knesset) truth to power about the fifth column in Israel’s midst and at its throat. Mind you, the real fifth column leadership, duly ensconced as part of Israel’s Arab representatives in the Knesset – despite the fact that they regularly meet with enemy leadership and worse – are allowed to remain in their seats. Pray tell, why? Hint: Jewish self-abasement.

THOUGH his actual assassination took place in the US (while on a speaking tour at New York City’s midtown Marriott Hotel), unconscionably, Israel’s political leadership (its chattering classes alike, in league with the Arab public) breathed a sigh of relief. In effect, saying, yes, an authentic right-wing thorn was removed from their sides. Believe it.

NOT unexpectedly – at least for those who understand the Islamic enemy for what they are, and wherever they are – his assassination was the ‘opening of Military Jihad on US soil.’ This is a provable fact.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, while Islamic jihadists live to kill Jews (Christians alike), it is imperative not to let Israel’s leadership off the hook, that is, to place the rightful onus atop the heads of the government and its back-benching self-appointed elitists.

MEMO to Jewish brothers and sisters who live in the diaspora: Jewish identity involves much more than paying lip service, proclaiming membership in the ‘tribe.’ It goes way beyond writing out a yearly check (whether large or small) to whatever org. has in its title Jewish or Israel, pretending as if ones duty is done. Not by a long shot.


Related image

Oregon Shooter’s Nexus To Islamic Terror: Critical Component Masked By Media & Obama Inc. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


LET’s get this straight: From the get go, one needn’t be a bonafide Muslim to perpetrate jihad on behalf of moon-god Allah. In fact, if one is a ‘sympathizer’ it is all the impetus required to kill infidels. And, one needn’t receive ‘orders’, per se, from another jihadi, hence, the ‘lone wolf’ appendage. Understood?

NOW, time will tell whether or not Chris Mercer was an actual Muslim, but no matter. Rather, his actions, connections alike, underlie why he opened fire and targeted Christians for slaughter. Mind you, had this area been known for its Jewish presence, well, they too would have been singled out for Islamic sacrifice.

INDEED, like night follows day, the captured media is running interference, quarter-backing, with a scripted narrative (yes, you read that right, scripted) as a form of distraction, yup, ‘the gun’ made him do it! So along comes the killer’s papa, opining: “That’s what guns are, the killers.” In other words, if folks are to believe that 1 + 1 = 3, along the same tortured and twisted calculus, cars should be banned because more people die in car accidents, as opposed to shootings. Alas, instead of blaming the driver – who may be drunk, otherwise impaired, distracted, speeding, etc. – or poor weather conditions, let’s ban cars! It is akin to the same knee-jerk vomit, that which benefits the criminally inclined as well as totalitarian leaders, leaving the truly innocent in the cross hairs. 

NOT only that, an armed air force vet, a student at the college with a concealed carry permit, was stopped from intervening by school officials! Who knows how many lives could have been spared, had he been allowed to assist. Mind blowing.

MOREOVER, forget about Obama Inc. and surrogates jibber-jabber, but do concentrate on the fact that he shared a ‘friendship’ with an absolute jihadi, an ISIS devotee. Coincidentally, said nexus went down the rabbit hole, still yet, the screen shots were captured by certain eagle eyes. 

Screen Shot 2015-10-02 at 1.56.25 AM

On his myspace page, Chris Harper-Mercer, 26, posted a photograph of himself holding a rifle, alongside images of masked IRA gunmen and an IRA terrorist video. The IRA and Palestinian terrorism have a long history.

He has just two friends — a girl and a jihadi. Check out the terror sympathizer’s page  praising:
“The brave Mujahideen heroes”
“The Mujahideen freedom fighters of Palestine. My brothers and sisters keep on doing your thing. Allahu Akbar.”
“my brave soldiers keep on fighting for the liberation of Palestine against Israel. f*ck Israel. Kill the Jews. jews are the only infidels.”
“The Quran ….. holy book of muslims”

The media has avoided mentioning this at all.

There is not much else — a profile from a “long dormant” dating site and a couple of random posts, that frankly give little to no insight into motive.

Screen Shot 2015-10-01 at 9.13.03 PM

Mahmoud Ali Ehsani’s Page looks like this:

Screen Shot 2015-10-01 at 9.12.32 PM

YOU got that?

NOT to be overlooked, once again, Obama Inc. refused to investigate a terror watch list from Russia, one which included Mercer as a ‘person of interest’! Is this not the same grave malfeasance which helped to facilitate Boston’s marathon jihad, duly reported at this site in April 2013, when a Russian tip-off was ignored??

AND, if there are those who are foolish enough to pooh-pooh said dereliction of duty by HUSSEIN Obama’s FEDS, well, they haven’t been paying attention to this site. As reported in May 2015, this investigative journalist possesses first-hand knowledge re said refusal to nip ongoing, active jihad in the heart of Massachusetts (elsewhere alike), one which will indubitably blow back onto innocent American civilians. Mind you, the hand-wringing will begin with: How did this happen? Reflexively, the media and Obama Inc. will do what they do best….spin and spin….blah, blah, blah…. 

EVEN so, for the most incisive analysis to date, that which duly ties in Mercer’s jihadi targeting of Christians, one must be knowledgeable (and brave) enough to step up and decimate the prescribed narrative. 

What is your Religion????
3 Oct 2015
Nov. 26, 2008, at a tourist hotel in Mumbai, India, a group of Islamic terrorists murdered 266 innocent people and injured over 250 more.  Their common question to the tourist’s at the hotel was “What is Your Religion”?  Christians and Jews were murdered because of their religion.  Muslims, for the most part, were allowed to live. Islamic terrorist’s Murder Jews & Christians.
On 1 Oct 2015, Chris Harper-Mercer entered a community college in Oregon and murdered 9 people and injured many more.  He asked students, “What is Your Religion”?  Regarding an article by Pamela Geller Oregon Shooter Islamic Ties,
have you heard any discussion on the major news outlets about Chris Harper-
Mercer’s religion or his ties to Jihad support?  Have you heard any Oregon law enforcement discussing Harper-Mercer’s ties to Islam?  Anything from the FBI or our pseudo President Obama?  No, and you will hear little of anything about Harper-Mercer’s ties to Islam and his support of jihad (murder) against non-Muslims at the Oregon community college.
America will continue to have Islamic supporters murder our children in their schools for many years to come.  I have written several articles since 2003 about Islamic terrorists who have openly stated they will target our children in America. (blogger’s note: Read a tag-team interview at Inquisitr featuring Dave Gaubatz and Adina Kutnicki, where he discusses their plans to specifically murder – and indoctrinate – US children, an outgrowth of his interrogations of al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.)
What can be done?  In reality very little can be done to prevent these type of murders because our senior law enforcement and politicians led by America’s Number One Islamic supporter (Obama) will not allow common sense security measures to be implemented.
It is common sense that if one military force has an enormous supply of weapons and the other side has virtually none, the more heavily armed will conquer their foe.    Instead of limiting the number of law-abiding Americans who can own and legally carry/store in their homes and allowed to carry openly and concealed in public, such arming must increase.  Obama and the media (to include FOX News) will never advocate or encourage every lawful American over the age of 18 to carry a firearm with them at all times.  This means at schools, work, sporting events, and, yes, even our military on U.S. bases and recruiting centers.  Seems strange we should even have to discuss U.S. military personnel being allowed to be armed in America.  Seems common sense to me.
The vast majority of Americans are law-abiding and the number of mass murderers are minimal.  If every lawful student in the Oregon college had a firearm do you think the murderer would have been able to kill nine and injure even more?  If criminals knew every American homeowner had firearms, every student in higher education schools had a firearm, every person in a bank had a firearm, every person at a sporting event had firearms, and every teacher and administrators in our elementary and high schools had firearms, do you think they would second guess themselves before planning a criminal act using a firearm.  Of course they would.
Islamic based terrorists and their supporters at all levels will continue to attack and murder innocent Christians and Jews around the world, and, yes, there will be more school type attacks in America.  Unfortunately there will continue to be Islamic terrorist supporters at the top-level of our political chain who will continue to provide more rights for Muslims than they will for Christians and Jews.
America needs a leader who is strong such as Russia’s President Putin.  We need someone such as Donald Trump, otherwise America will fall just as Rome fell many years ago.

IN tandem with all of the above – coupled with Dave Gaubatz’s on target analysis – is it any wonder that the same media surrogates who regularly bastardize the truth on behalf of Obama Inc. executed a figurative white-wash on an obvious bi-racial jihadi killer, one whose own selfie didn’t even hide his black heritage? 

(On the left is the selfie Christopher Mercer uploaded to his social media. On the right is how CNN presented the same selfie in broadcast stories about him. Why did CNN need to change the complexion (color) of their broadcast? Why is no-one showing pictures of mom, Laurel Margaret Harper? His online profiles have been erased since the shooting.)

mercer cnn

BOTTOM LINE: Make no mistake, the likes of Mercer (alongside ‘garden variety’ criminal types) will always get their hands on weapons, yet, the average American – if HUSSEIN Obama has his way – will be more than sitting ducks. Think about it. Patriots, you know what you have to do….

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}


NO Data, NO (Substantive) Vetting of “Refugees”: FEDS Forced To ‘Fess Up! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

PAR for the course, akin to pulling a mouthful of teeth, the only time that a glimmer of truth is dragged from Obama Inc. is when they are pushed against the wall. Inveterate liars. Reprobates extraordinaire.

Animated Pants on Fire

AS to their penchant for lying, well, it is tome-worthy. If anything, their modus operandi is emblematic of an overall pattern of deceit, that which rivals history’s most infamous gangsters. Not only that, said outlaws pale in comparison to Obama Inc. and their willfully corrupt surrogates. Indeed, their ultimate and world-class betrayal can be found within: House of Bribes: How The United States led The Way To A Nuclear Iran. May G-d have mercy on the innocents who are in their wake – Obama Inc.’s and the Mullocracy.

NOT only that, but along this treacherous terrain await countless minefields, and it is basically a matter of timing when they finally blow up, individually or collectively. So aside from today’s – soon to be revealed – “admission”, another tall-tale was exposed very recently, and it served to tighten the noose around the leadership’s neck:

EVERY time this site connects the dots re HUSSEIN Obama’s “rebels” (McCain’s pets alike) to their masters in Washington, well, the noose keeps tightening around their necks – and this is not in reference to al-Qaeda and offshoots! In other words, it has already been proven that the so-called “rebels” are not only aligned with al-Qaeda – eventually, they pledged their allegiance to ISIS – but massive amounts of US weapons have been “inherited” by them. Not only that, HUSSEIN Obama essentially gifted heavy weaponry (and assorted ordinances) to Sunni and Shia jihadists, after he ordered the pull out of all troops from Iraq and left the equipment in plain view. Resultant, they laid claim to the booty. Happenstance?

LO and behold, along comes the belated “admission” that al-Qaeda is in possession of “surrendered” weapons from the “rebels”, yet, the public is supposed to believe that it was a mistake. Oh, puleeze!…..

THUS, the question becomes: Why are they ‘fessing up at this point in time to the “surrendered” weapons, as indicated below?

Another massive embarrassment for the Obama administration, as U.S. officials finally admitted on Friday—after days of strenuous denials—that the latest group of “moderate” New Syrian Force rebels surrendered at least some of their weapons and vehicles to al-Qaeda in exchange for “safe passage” into Syria.….continue reading….

ALAS, true to form, when the fish stinks from the head up, the putrid stench can be felt near and far. As always, those who swim alongside said foul creatures are equally toxic. Stretching the analogy a bit more, in the same manner that DHS facilitated the infiltration and penetration of enumerable illegals into America, along comes CENTCOM and their falsification of intel! On and on the sell-outs accrue….

TO wit, did anyone think that Obama Inc.’s “refugee” resettlement program would execute its mandated due diligence, in effect, VETTING those who seek entry, and from Islamic jihadi nations no less?? Do pigs fly too?

THUS, as is said, the cat is – once again – out of the (lying) bag: (linked video)

In a blistering cross-examination of officials responsible for the U.S. refugee resettlement program, it was revealed at a Senate hearing Thursday that more than 90 percent of Syrians who apply for refugee status get approved despite very little data being available to check for security risks.

The officials who run the program also either don’t know or refused to say how many refugees have become terrorists once resettled on U.S. soil, nor could they say what percentage of refugees they are able to positively identify before letting them into the country.

Immigration officials responsible for screening refugees made an attempt to show that the process is rigorous and “continuously being improved,” but Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., dismissed the generalities and demanded specific answers during a two-hour hearing before the Senate subcommittee on immigration and the national interest.

The U.S. State Department, which works with the United Nations to send 70,000 to 100,000 refugees per year directly from the Third World into U.S. cities and towns, has long described the screening process as “the most rigorous of all travelers coming into the United States.”

That statement was made again at the opening of Thursday’s hearing.

But Sessions drilled down to specifics as to exactly what the meaning of “rigorous” is.

Testifying was Matthew Emrich, associate director for Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within the Department of Homeland Security.

Sessions asked if Emrich’s department had access to even a single database in Syria that could provide solid background records on refugees in order to confirm a refugee is who he says he is.

“Can you name a single computer database outside of maybe some of our own very small but valuable intelligence databases for Syria that you can check against. Does Syria have any?” Sessions asked.

“The government does not, no sir,” Emrich answered.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

Sessions pointed out from various press reports that Syrian passports can be purchased on the black market for as little as $200, and that nearly half of the refugees pouring into Europe are actually from Pakistan, Afghanistan, north Africa and other hotbeds of Islamic terrorism.

Emrich said in many instances refugees “do have documents from Syria, and we do have ways of identifying those documents, as she (colleague Barbara Strack with the Refugee Affairs Division at DHS) mentioned our officers are trained in fraud detection.”

Sessions repeatedly reminded Emrich and Strack that a top FBI counter-terrorism official, Michael Steinbach, testified to Congress earlier this year and admitted that the U.S. has no access to reliable law enforcement data inside Syria because it is has become a “failed state” where the U.S. has no “boots on the ground.”

“Michael Steinbach on Feb 11 expressed serious concerns with the screening of Syrian refugees. I don’t see how you can gloss over this,” Sessions said. “He said… you’re talking about a country that is a failed state, that does not have any infrastructure and therefore any of the institutions you would normally go to and seek data on these individuals, do not exist.”

Emrich said there is some data available, but not from the refugee’s home country, “and we’d be happy to describe it to you in a different setting. We check everything that’s available.”

“But Mr. Steinbach is making a serious point, that there are no databases to check,” Sessions said.

“We check everything that we have available within U.S. holdings. As far as I’m concerned if we haven’t overturned every stone we are in the process of overturning every stone,” Emrich responded.

“There you go,” Sessions said. “We’re turning over everything we can overturn. I don’t deny that. But you don’t have their criminal records, you don’t have the computer database that you can check, so isn’t Mr Steinbach telling the truth? That in many cases it just doesn’t exist?”

Emrich then made a startling admission. “In many countries the U.S. accepts refugees from, the country did not have extensive data holdings,” he said.

“I’m asking you to talk to the American people,” Sessions said. “The American people are asking you a question. I know what Mr. Steinbach said. So aren’t you left with basically looking at whatever document they produce and whatever they tell you?”

Emrich said he could assure the American people “that we have a robust screening process and these processes are continually reviewed and upgraded whenever possible, and it includes an in-depth interview with a trained U.S. government officer and is accompanied by an additional interview, an inspection rather, when the person presents him or herself at a U.S. port of entry.”

Sessions, a former federal prosecutor, again dug in his heels and would not accept Emrich’s answer.

“I’ve been in law enforcement for 15 years,” Sessions said. “I know how the national crime information system works, I know how these checks are conducted. There’s no way you can do background checks on these people. If you get a hit on a background check, you can reject that person, but you have only a miniscule number of people who have been identified in that fashion, so I don’t believe you can tell us with any certainty that that person is who he says he is. So aren’t you left with looking at whatever document they produce?

“Is there any way you can actually send someone to Iraq or Syria and see if someone actually lived on the street where they said they lived, or actually had the job he claims to have had?”

Emrich said his department does not have the ability to send an investigator to Syria but relies on biometric and biographical information.

“I’m sure there are things you can do, but are you saying you can independently verify with positive data on the majority of cases?” Sessions asked. “Can you give me a number? Is it 50 percent, 60 percent, 80 percent?”

“I can’t give you a number sir,” said Strack.

“And the reason is, you don’t have the ability,” Sessions concluded. “I wish you did, but you don’t.”

Turning to terror

Sessions then went down a list of refugees who turned into terrorists after they were resettled in the United States. He mentioned six Somali men from Minnesota charged last week, an Uzbek Muslim refugee in Idaho who was convicted in August for making bombs and recruiting other Muslims to attack U.S. military installations, seven others in Minnesota charged with trying to join ISIS, among dozens of others.

“The problems we face are here, now,” he said. “This is not just scare tactics. A coach in Minneapolis said ‘there are monsters out there,’ more than 20 young (refugees) from Minnesota between 2007 and 2009 left to join al-Shabab (an al-Qaida affiliate in Somalia). And in the past year disappearances began again, this time to the Islamic State. Ms. Strack and Mr. Emrich you don’t have the ability to do security checks on these people.”

Sessions asked, “Can any of you tell me of the number of persons granted refugee status since 2001 who have been affiliated with terrorist activity?”

Neither Strack, nor Emrich nor the other officials testifying Thursday could answer that question. Among those who sat mum was Robert Carey, director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement which operates within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

“Well we have a lot of public records on them,” Sessions said, “certainly not complete.”

Sessions’ subcommittee established a list of 72 men arrested between July 2014 and July 30, 2015, who were charged with terrorist activity and appear to be immigrants from Muslim nations.

More than 73 percent of refugees receive food stamps, and the figures are even higher among refugees from the Middle East, Sessions said, citing a congressional research office report.


welfare usage by ME refugeesLarry Bartlett, director of admissions for the U.S. State Department’s refugee program, said most of the refugees have been coming from Iraq, Bhutan, Burma and the Democratic Republic of Congo with Syria now added to the mix.

Sessions cited a Washington Post article that said the Tsarnaev family arrived in the United States in 2002 as refugees and their two sons came a short time later. They were actually asylum seekers, which is a similar but different category of immigrant. Their two sons grew up and became the Boston Marathon bombers.

Kerry said refugees are resettled in 173 cities in 48 states.

Sessions asked if local cities and towns are consulted before refugees arrive.

“What’s your policy on that and can you assure us that any community that will receive a direct flow of refugees will be consulted?”

Bartlett said quarterly briefings are conducted.

“We have 320 resettlement affiliates and we require them to do consultations each quarter of the year with elected officials, the city council and mayor, school officials, hospitals and health clinics, law enforcement and any volunteer groups supporting refugees,” he said. “That takes place quarterly, and includes a representative of the state government, usually the governor’s office.”

Democrats call for more refugees, shorter screening period

Senate Democrats on the committee, Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Al Franken, D-Minn., asked almost no questions during the rare oversight hearing and used their time to comment on the tear-jerking photos of refugees in Europe.

Klobuchar said she was “very proud” of the Vietnamese and Somalis who came to Minnesota as refugees and are now “a very important part of the fabric of our state.” She did not mention the more than 50 Somalis who have left or tried to leave the country to try to join the ranks of foreign Islamic terrorist organizations, nor did she mention the dozens of others who have been tried and convicted in her state for offering material support to Islamic terrorist organizations.

The Democrats focused their emotion-based stories of desperate women and children seeking a better life, when the U.N. statistics show that 75 percent of the migrants flooding into Europe are men between the ages of 18 and 45.

Blumenthal said he’d like to see the screening process, which now lasts 18 to 24 months, dramatically shortened and reformed.

“My feeling is the American people still believe that we are the nation of the Statue of Liberty, that we have arms open for people that want to come here to escape persecution and conflict,” Blumenthal said.

(Refugees flooding Germany but U.S. ‘not doing enough’ said Senate Democrats during an oversight hearing on the U.S. refugee resettlement program.)

Refugees flooding Germany but U.S. 'not doing enough' said Senate Democrats during an oversight hearing on the U.S. refugee resettlement program.

No mention of persecuted Middle East Christians

No mention was made at Thursday’s hearing by any member of the Senate about the persecuted Christian minorities in Iraq and Syria. As many as 350,000 Christians have been forced to flee their homes, their property stolen, their wives and daughters raped and sold into sex slavery, often after watching their husbands beheaded or shot.

WND has previously reported that 95 percent of the more than 1,650 Syrians who have come to the U.S. since the beginning of Syrian civil war have been Muslim and less than 4 percent have been Christian.

The Democrats on the committee also pointed out that 18 mayors including Rahm Emanuel of Chicago have signed a letter asking the Obama administration to resettle Syrian refugees in their cities “because refugee make their cities stronger economically and socially.”

‘Faith leaders’ want more Muslim refugees

Another letter, signed by 144 “faith leaders,” was sent to Obama asking that the government not restrict the number of Muslim refugees allowed into the country from Syria or elsewhere.

Franken also talked about the photo of the drowned boy whose body washed up on shores of Greece and how it reminded him of his grandson.

“Many of our partners in the EU are formulating a plan to redistribute 120,000 migrants,” he said. “The U.S. on other hand has only accepted 1,500 Syrian refugees (actually the number has now exceeded 1,650), although the administration plans to up that to 10,000. I joined with my colleagues, Senator Durbin and others, asking for 65,000 by end of 2016.”

Besides security, Sessions said the cost of the refugee program is staggering. The cost of administering the program is more than $1 billion a year, but that doesn’t include the billions spent on government assistance programs and lost jobs for Americans.

“The costs are much greater Mr. Kerry than you suggested in your statement. While we had 18 Democrat mayors asking President Obama to send more Syrian refugees to their cities, homelessness has doubled in the United States. Every new dollar spent on refugees is essentially borrowed because it’s new expenses and we don’t’ have new revenue to pay for it. There is homelessness in New York City, joblessness, so I would say someone else needs to help (the refugees). I don’t accept the idea that we aren’t doing our fair share. We have been very generous.”

The U.S. has granted $4.5 billion in aid to Syrian refugees since 2012.

“Europe should be picking up the largest share of the problem and I don’t see it there,” Sessions said. “And a good policy should be to help keep people close to home, in Yemen, in Libya, in Iraq, so people can go home more easily when the time comes, and we’ve allowed that to get away from us. We need to look at who are we going to serve and whose interest are we trying to serve?”

RESULTANT, the Betrayer-in-Chief has been gearing up for the ultimate betrayal – atop his Iranian treachery – the swamping of America with third world infiltrators, chiefly, Islamic terrorists!

CONSEQUENTIALLY, how many clarion calls have to be blared, before patriots rise up en mass to stop the madness? Oh, who the hell knows…


{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

House Of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Iran Deal - Kerry, Hassan Rouhanni, Obama & Ali Khamenei

DEDICATED readers (numbering in the millions…thanks for that) are aware that this investigative journalist enjoys a myriad of “relationships.” Some, though not all, are detailed within. And this is important to understand for various reasons, least of which are the shared confidences between parties. 

NOW, one such relationship exists with USA Transnational Report. Accordingly, this site unreservedly recommends the most comprehensive report to date on the (purposeful) nuclear-arming of Iran. Its documented basis will clear through the smoke and mirrors, that which HUSSEIN Obama’s regime blew in the direction of the free world.

ITS contributors include: 

Adina Kutnicki, Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Hannah Szenes, Right Side News, Marcus Kohan, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trevor Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo.

WITHOUT further ado,“House Of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran.” (pdf here)

“I think that the American companies will be welcomed in Iran… This is not a game for junior companies, and I call juniors anything below a billion-dollar market cap. This is a big-money game.”
– An American Portfolio Manager, July 2015

Table of Contents

Executive Summary
The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee
National Iranian-American Council (NIAC)
The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros
Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster
Complicity of the GOP

Executive Summary

The Iranian nuclear deal is a full capitulation to Iran’s terrorist mastermind Mullahs, and the latest in a series of betrayals of the American people and allies by the Obama administration.  At the highest level of the administration, Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor, the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, prioritized rapprochement with the terror state.  Throughout the process and negotiations, she had the backing of billionaire investor (and Obama-backer) George Soros, and his multi-headed network of tax-exempt foundations.  Their efforts were driven by deep-rooted anti-Semitism and personal greed.  Meanwhile, since the mid-1990s, a small but very connected Iranian lobby (funded, in part, by George Soros) has been laying the groundwork for normalizing relations with Tehran.  Operating through a variety of non-governmental organizations and political action committees, the lobby courted Democrat and Republican politicians.  With the election of (Soros-backed) Obama in 2008, the Iranian lobby had very receptive ears in the White House.  International business interests were courted and effectively bribed with access to Iranian markets, until finally the deal was realized, approved, and sealed by a vote of the United Nations Security Council.


Thus far, the reports and exposés issued by the New Coalition of Concerned Citizens* have focused on the threat posed by Islamists to American sovereignty.  The Qatar Awareness Campaign brought to light extensive influence network of the State of Qatar and their ruling al-Thani family.  The Betrayal Papers explained the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of the Obama administration’s agenda and policies, foreign and domestic.

This report will detail the sinister influence of the small, yet well-connected and very powerful, Iran lobby.  Though the Iran lobby’s highest level contacts are prominent Democrats, their reach spans both major political parties.  Like previous exposés, this investigation will mention familiar names, including George Soros, Valerie Jarrett, and the United Nations.

Iran is widely regarded by counterterrorism experts as the heart of Islamic radicalism, and the point of origin for terrorism with a specific geopolitical agenda (i.e., the creation of an Islamic Caliphate, much like the Islamic State, but dominated by Shiites, not Sunnis).  With the eager embrace of a legacy-hungry Obama administration, the Iran lobby managed to achieve a deal which makes the United States the de facto most powerful backer of Islamic terrorism in the world.

How did this happen?


Since its 1979 Islamic revolution, Iran has been the epicenter of Islamic terrorism throughout the region and the world.  Immediately following Ayatollah Khomeini’s return to Tehran from France and ascension to power, Iran took American hostages at the embassy in Tehran.  In 1983, Iranian terror proxy Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 307, including 241 American servicemen.  In 1994, Iran’s proxy Hezbollah bombed a Jewish center in Buenos Aires, killing 85 and wounding more than 300.  Sponsors of both Hamas and Hezbollah, a New York court found that Iran materially supported and directed Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks.

In the decades since the Islamic Republic came into existence, Tehran has proved eager to embrace terror, partnering with various factions around the world.  Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, translated the work of the Muslim Brotherhood’s leading author and theorist, Sayyid Qutb, into Persian, proving that Sunnis (Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Al Qaeda, etc.) and Shiites (Iran, Hezbollah) will gladly cooperate in terrorizing the West.

Today, Iran’s presence in Latin America is also strong.  In countries such as Venezuela, Mexico, Peru, and Argentina, Iranian-backed Islamic terror cells work hand-in-hand with drug cartels.  The tri-border region between Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil is Hezbollah’s main hub in South America.  Terrorists, cartels, and organized crime “move liquor, electronic goods, cocaine, refugees, even babies” across the region’s three frontiers.  Following the 1992 and 1994 bombings in Buenos Aires, western intelligence tracked Islamic terrorist activity to the tri-border region.  Today, although intelligence continues to operate in the area, the criminal activity is so rampant that local authorities rarely interfere.

Partnering with South American cartels and organized crime provides a revenue source for terror, while increasing Iran’s strategic footprint in our southern hemisphere.  It also highlights a unique problem related to the non-enforcement of security on America’s southern border.

The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee

The Iran lobby of today appears to have its origins in the work of two individuals.  One of those individuals is Baquer Namazi, who heads a central and critical Iranian non-governmental organization (NGO).  Namazi’s son, Siamak, co-founded the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) with Trita Parsi, who was a consultant to Republican Congressman Bob Ney of Ohio.

The other individual is Hassan Namazee, who was a major political fundraiser, especially (but not exclusively) for Democrats.  He is now serving a prison sentence after admitting guilt in committing bank fraud.

Baquer Namazi and Hamyaran – Corruption and Influence through NGOs and the United Nations

In 1998, elements within the Iranian government, Iranian NGO community, and international organizations (including the United Nations) formed the NGO Hamyaran.  It was conceived as, and operates as, an “umbrella” NGO for all other Iranian state-connected NGOs.

As one source explains:

“In addition to monitoring and controlling the Iran’s NGOs, Hamyaran is charged with channeling all contacts and relations of the NGOs with the international organizations and the UN. Under the supervision of the government, Hamyaran is also charged with creating communication channels with the Iranians living in the US.”

In a word, Hamyaran is Tehran’s organization to police and propagate the pro-Iranian (and thus pro-Mullah) message within the United States, and more broadly to the West.  It does this under the auspices of the United Nations.

Since Hamyaran’s founding in 1998 by Dr. Hossein Malek-Afzali, a high ranking Iranian government official who at one time served in President Ahmadinejad’s cabinet, the NGO has been co-led by Malek Afzali and Baquer Namazi.

  • Like Malek-Afzali, Baquer Namazi is closely tied to the government in Tehran. Baquer was previously the governor of the province of Khuzestan, in addition to holding multiple other high level positions in the government.  He has also held positions with the United Nations, including being a Member of the Advisory Panel of U.N. Center for Regional Development, Nagoya.
  • Namazi’s son, Siamak, founded the International Association of Iranian Managers (I-AIM). The organization is dedicated to recruiting high-powered “Iranian elites” in the United States.
  • Siamak’s partner in I-AIM, Ali Mostashari, was a strategic advisor to the Assistant Secretary General and Director of the Regional Bureau for Africa at the United Nations Development Program. He has been accused by reporters of directing U.N. funds into Iran for his own benefit and the benefit of the ruling Mullahs.
  • Siamak Namazi, with Republican consultant Trita Parsi, founded the National Iranian-American Council. It is arguably the primary lobbying arm of Tehran in Washington, D.C.

Like many of the Obama administration’s other scandals, it is clear from the facts above that the United Nations was used to supersede American law and sovereignty.  Furthermore, in keeping with the trends of Obama scandals, several tax-exempt NGOs were central to the plan.  This points to an inept, if not complicit, I.R.S.

Hassan Nemazee & Iranian- American PAC (IAPAC): Democrat Fundraiser Extraordinaire

If Baquer Namazi, his son Siamak, and their associates cemented the relationship between the Iran lobby and United Nations, Hassan Nemazee[i] was the Iran lobby’s man in the Democrat Party.  Before admitting to bank fraud in 2010, Nemazee was a star fundraiser for top Democrats.

  • In 2008, Nemazee served as one of Hillary Clinton’s national fundraising chairmen when she was running against Barack Obama in the Democrat primary.
  • Nemazee was eventually credited by the Obama campaign with helping raise $500,000, following Clinton’s defeat in the primary. He donated an additional $50,000 to Obama’s inauguration committee.
  • Also in 2008, Nemazee donated $9,200 to Biden for President Inc.
  • In 2007, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) was the featured guest speaker at IAPAC’s annual New York City reception.
  • In 2006, Senator Chuck Schumer asked Nemazee to serve as finance chairman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Nemazee raised $119 million, helping to retake the Senate for Democrats and installing Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader.
  • In 2004, Nemazee raised $500,000 for Democrat nominee (and current Secretary of State) John Kerry. Kerry, of course, was the lynchpin in securing the Iranian nuclear deal.
  • In 2000, Nemazee donated $50,000 to the Gore-Lieberman Recount Committee.


Hassan Nemazee (right) with Terry McAuliffe

Yet Nemazee’s influence was not limited exclusively to the Democrat Party, and neither is the Iran lobby’s influence in general.   He and his partner, Alan Quasha had a history of giving to Republicans, too.

  • Before joining with the Clintons, Nemazee gave to Republican senators, including: Jesse Helms (R-NC), Sam Brownback (R-KS), and Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY).
  • Nemazee was represented in his fraud case by attorney Marc Mukasey, son of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007.
  • In the 1980s, Namazee’s business partner, Alan Quasha, provided George W. Bush a spot on the board of his oil company, Harken Energy.
  • Quasha is a decidedly bipartisan donor: he gave to Bush and Gore in 2000, to Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, and Barack Obama and Chris Dodd in 2008.

Hassan Nemazee was on the board of the Iranian-American Political Action Committee (IAPAC) until 2009.   Public disclosures of IAPAC highlight the bi-partisan nature of their enterprise; from 2008-2014, it gave significantly to Republicans and Democrats.

  • 2014 Total Spent: $87,668       Democrats: 63%               Republicans: 37%
  • 2012 Total Spent: $88,264       Democrats: 59%               Republicans: 41%
  • 2010 Total Spent: $67,609       Democrats: 46%               Republicans: 38%
  • 2008 Total Spent: $395,852     Democrats: 52%               Republicans: 48%
  • 2006 Total Spent: $263,579     Democrats: 58%               Republicans: 42%
  • 2004 Total Spent: $224,871     Democrats: 42%               Republicans: 58%


(See here for more information related to IAPAC campaign contributions; also available on a per-candidate basis.  A full list of IAPAC endorsed candidates can be found on their website, here.)

Note that the greatest sum of money was spent by IAPAC in 2008, the year that Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the Presidency.  He brought with him his Iranian-born advisor, Valerie Jarrett.

National Iranian-American Council (NIAC)

The Iranian lobby that convinced Washington to thaw relations with the world’s most prolific state sponsor of terror evolved out of the work of Baquer Namazi and Hassan Nemazee, as well as the guiding hand and money of George Soros.

The National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) is the primary conduit for Tehran’s lobby efforts in Washington, D.C.  NIAC managed to pressure the U.S. government to subordinate international security and stability to narrow corporate interests, access Iranian markets, and the revenues that it can potentially provide.

Let’s take a closer look at one of NIAC’s co-founders, Siamak Namazi.

Siamak Namazi – Background Information

  • Son of Baquer Namazi. Family is close to Iranian regime; in particular, they are a core part of the (former president) Rafsanjani faction within Iran.
  • Co-founder of NIAC with Trita Parsi.
  • Works for family company, the Iranian-based consultancy called Atieh Bahar Consulting (AB). The consultancy serves as a facilitator for outside business interests looking to enter the Iranian market.  It does so by brokering relationships with key officials and Iranian powerbrokers.
  • Currently the Head of Strategic Planning at the United Arab Emirates Crescent Petroleum. Gulftainer, which, like Crescent Petroleum, is owned by the Crescent Group, recently acquired a long-term lease of Port Canaveral for container operations.  It is in the immediate vicinity of a nuclear sub pen, a USAF base, and NASA.

The Namazi family business, Atieh Bahar Consulting, depends on foreign business interest in Iran to generate revenues.  Their work is done with the blessing of Tehran, and thus they are in good graces with the Islamic Republic and its ruling Mullahs.

Following first President Clinton’s sanctions on Iran, and then the nuclear issue, American business was blocked from entering the Iranian market.   Siamak needed a way to circumvent Clinton’s sanctions.  He found an academic partner in Trita Parsi, who also brought his critical experience as a Washington-based political consultant.

Siamak Namazi

In 2002, Siamak Namazi, son of Baquer, co-founded the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC).
His partner in this new enterprise was Trita Parsi, an Iranian Swede, then employed as a political consultant to Congressman Robert Ney (R-OH).  (Note: In 2006, Ney pled guilty to corruption charges related to the lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and served 17 months in prison.)

Beginning in 1997, Parsi systematically convinced Ney to lobby for the normalization of Iranian diplomatic and economic relations.  He did this through his original organization, Iranians for International Cooperation (IIC).

In the words taken from a document prepared by Parsi himself:

“The first achievement of IIC can be traced back to the summer of 1997 when Trita Parsi worked as a political consultant for Congressman Robert Ney of Ohio. Congressman Ney was at the time a proponent of the US’s isolation policy of Iran and had contacts with the Mujahedine Khalq terrorist organization. Mr. Parsi was hired to consult the Ohio Congressman on his policy vis-à-vis Iran, and persuade him to reconsider his position in favor of a pro-dialogue, pro-engagement policy.”

Like Hamyaran, which is at the center of the Iranian NGO web, NIAC is at the center of the Iran lobby’s web.  It serves as a magnet for Iranian Americans who are sympathetic to Tehran, and in many cases have a financial interest in normalizing relations.

NIAC’s Influence in the United States

NIAC has approximately 5,000 dues paying members, and access to tens of thousands of additional fellow travelers.   The below profiles some of NIAC’s most accomplished associates.

  • Trita Parsi – In addition to the information above, Trita Parsi has courted the leading presidential advisors, Republican and Democrat, including those to George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama. In 2003, Trita had Congressman Ney present a “grand bargain” to Karl Rove from the Iranian government.  Parsi is a practical VIP in the Obama White House, reportedlyconsulting with Valerie Jarrett and advising both the State Department and the CIA.
  • Reza Marashi – A former employee of AB Consulting, Marashi found employment with the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University, which functions as a think tank for the Pentagon. Later he worked for the Office of Iranian Affairs at the U.S. Department of State “as a desk officer overseeing Iran democracy and human-rights programs.”
  • Sahar Nowrouzzadeh – A top advisor to Obama on Iran policy, Nowrouzzadeh is National Security Council director for Iran at the White House. Prior to this position, she worked at the State Department and Department of Defense.

Of course, NIAC propagandists like Marashi and Nowrouzzadeh had a more than friendly audience in the Obama administration: they had a White House willing to finish their work for them.  The whole history of the administration showcases Obama’s and Valerie Jarrett’s infatuation with Iran.

  • Prior to the 2008 election, the Obama team dispatched former ambassador William G. Miller to Iran, informing the Mullahs that they would get a better deal once Obama was in office.
  • Obama ignored the revolutionary Green Movement in 2009, and let the Iranian government kill and imprison the reform-minded protestors.
  • Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State at the time of the Green Movement’s uprising, was advised by Trita Parsi not to support the protesters.
  • John Kerry’s son-in-law’s best man at his daughter’s wedding is the son of Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, the Iranian’s main negotiator in nuclear talks.

Minutes from a 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meeting make it clear that NIAC was in contact with and supportive of Hassan Nemazee’s lobbying efforts.  From the minutes:

“Goli Ameri initiative and the creation of PAAIA with Hassan Nemazee and others… Trita mentioned key Silicon Valley’s IA’s as having contributed… and expressed admiration for Goli Ameri’s fundraising ability… Kami wondered whether we could ask PAAIA to join us in the ‘stop the war’ cause.”

Finally, as if it was written in the stars that the Obama administration would usher in an Iranian nuclear regime, Valerie Jarret was born in Shiraz, Iran, in a hospital named after Hassan Nemazee’s father.

Trita Parsi

NIAC Action – NIAC’s New Political Action Committee

In the opening weeks of the controversy over the Iranian nuclear deal this year, NIAC launched its own political action committee.  A 501(c)(4) organization (i.e., tax exempt), NIAC Action “aims to direct money from the Iranian-American community, which is relatively well-off compared to other immigrant groups, toward more concerted political activism.”

From his earliest days as a pro-Iranian activist, Trita Parsi was deeply impressed by the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC).  Perhaps the clearest indication of the pro-Iranian lobbyists’ awe of the Israeli lobby was the name chosen to be AIPAC’s Iranian counterpart – IAPAC (mentioned above).

NIAC Action is “explicitly meant to counter the influence of AIPAC.”  Minutes from the 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meetingconvey NIAC’s near obsession with the Israeli lobby:

“Trita clarified the fact that AIPAC does not debate – they are all-action and only move forward with their clear agenda.  Alex raised the fact that AIPAC is successful in some measure because they operate ‘under the radar’ and employ the axiom ‘don’t do it publicly.’  ‘A lobby is a night flower’ quote was mentioned by Trita as another example of how to lobby effectively.”

Indeed, the origins and thinking of the Iran lobby have been anti-Israel, and anti-American, from the outset.

The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros

Billionaire investor and political manipulator George Soros played a significant role in shaping and funding the Iranian lobby.  As in the Arab Spring, Soros deliberately sided with the most extreme elements in Iran, who, like the Muslim Brotherhood, also happen to be the most anti-Semitic.

Soros, whose wealth from investing and hedge fund management exceeds $20 billion, has used his political influence to affect political “change” in multiple countries.  For example, in Ukraine, he has funded NGOs going back to the Cold War.  In Egypt, he was instrumental in ousting long-time American ally Hosni Mubarak, and beginning the so-called Arab Spring.

Likewise, Soros has funded, and supported otherwise, various organizations that have been influential in opening Iran to the West.

  • In 2006, the National-Iranian American Council (NIAC), led by Trita Parsi, received $50,000 from Soros’s Open Society Institute.
  • In 2009, NIAC received $125,000 from the Open Society Institute, and an additional $25,000 from its foundation, the Foundation to Promote Open Society.
  • Minutes from a 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meeting indicate that Parsi spent a weekend strategizing with Steve Clemons(spelled “Clemence” in linked document) of the Soros-funded New America Foundation. They discussed how to counter the $75 million that the U.S. government had allocated to support regime change in Iran.
  • NIAC hosted Ambassador Thomas Pickering to lead a panel discussion on “finding the nuclear fix,” a reference to Iran’s standoff with the West. Not only is Pickering a trustee at Soros’ International Crisis Group, but he helped cover up the Benghazi scandal, and has ties to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (a Muslim Brotherhood front organization).
  • In June 2015, Pickering argued on NPR that the Iranian nuclear deal was good policy.

Soros and the National Endowment for Democracy

Moreover, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is known to be closely associated with George Soros.  It also funded NIAC.

In 2012, documents released by a Malaysian press outfit detailed receiving grants from the National Endowment for Democracy.  Evidencing the corruption that Soros money brings to media, a former news editor of the outfit had resigned a decade earlier because of the NED’s relationship with Soros.

Similarly, NED’s connection to Soros and various “color revolutions,” which have occurred since 2000 (e.g., Georgia’s 2003 Rose Revolution and Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution), caused Russia to ban the NED this summer.

  • NED is technically a private institution that receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. Congress through the State Department. Many speculate it is also funded privately by Soros.
  • In 2002, shortly after NIAC was formed by Trita Parsi and Siamak Namazi, the National Endowment for Democracyexpedited an application for grant money to NIAC.
  • NIAC is estimated to have received approximately $200,000 in grants from the NED.
  • NIAC’s spent the NED grant money on sending two NIAC members to work with Baquer Namazi’s Hamyaran, the Iranian government’s umbrella NGO. Allegedly NIAC was teaching Hamyaran to use “computer based digital media.”

The Ploughshares Fund

The Ploughshares Fund, an international charity, characterizes itself as “a global security foundation.  [Ploughshares] support[s] experts and advocates who implement smart strategies to secure a more peaceful world, including one free of nuclear weapons.”

The Ploughshares Fund describes the Iranian nuclear deal as “a major advance for global security.”  Joe Cirincione, its president, is quoted as saying on July 14, 2015:

“This is a very good deal. It is a major victory for American national security. We have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to stop Iran from building a nuclear bomb, without putting a single U.S. soldier in harm’s way.”

The Ploughshares Fund, besides being a strong proponent of the Iranian nuclear deal, is a Soros-funded operation, with several key connections to American policy makers, and NIAC.

  • Former Secretary of Defense under Obama, Chuck Hagel (a Republican), was on the Board of the Ploughshares Fund when nominated by Obama. (He joined Ploughshares in 2009.)  Ploughshares applauded his nomination to Secretary of Defense.
  • One of the primary advocates of the Iranian nuclear deal for the Obama administration is Robert Creamer. The Wall Street Journal reviewed a transcript of a conference call hosted by Ploughshares, which quoted Creamer as saying: “The other side will go crazy. We have to be really clear that it’s a good deal.”
  • According to Aaron Klein at WND, “a primary Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, a money tunnel in which leftist donors provide funds to finance other radical groups. Tides is itself funded by Soros.”
  • One of Ploughshares other benefactors is Soros’s Open Society Institute.
  • The Ploughshares Fund has partnered with other Soros-funded and anti-Israel groups including Code Pink, the Institute for Policy Studies, and the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation.
  • Former CIA covert officer Valerie Plame, who accused President George W. Bush of outing her in an attempt to intimidate, was hired by Ploughshares Fund in September 2015. In fact, it was Undersecretary of State, Richard Armitage, who, while serving under Colin Powell, “outed” Plame.  The manufactured scandal was used to smear and discredit President Bush, who, at the time, was trying to counter Iran’s influence in Iraq.
  • Powell has come out in support of the Iranian nuclear deal: his support is touted by Ploughshares.
  • Finally, a recent attack piece on one of the deal’s critics provides additional evidence of Soros’s determination to seal the deal. Media Matters, a Soros-funded operation, published a weak retort to an exposé in The Daily Beast.   Among other claims, it attempts to dismiss the overwhelmingly obvious connection between the Namazis and NIAC.

On more than one occasion (see here and here), Soros has used his relationship with the American government for his own financial benefit.  Opening Iran, with the world’s second largest natural gas reserves and fourth largest oil reserves, could prove a windfall for businesses with the right political connections.

Is it Soros’s greed that caused him to support this deal?  Is it his anti-Semitism?  Perhaps, most likely, it is the twisted intersection of both.

Martin Indyk: The Soros-linked, Foreign-funded Salesman for the Iranian Deal

Ambassador Martin Indyk has served as U.S. Ambassador to Israel twice (April 1995 to September 1997 and January 2000 to July 2001), appointed both times by President Bill Clinton.  In July 2013, when Indyk was at the Brookings Institution, Obama appointed Indyk to be Washington’s special Middle East envoy for the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.  Indyk has been a vocal critic of Israel – to the point of being insulting – and one of the strongest voices in favor of the Iranian nuclear deal.

  • Indyk is the Executive Vice President at the Brookings Institution and a founding director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings (located in Doha, Qatar).
  • The President of the Brookings Institution is Strobe Talbott, a friend and advisor of George Soros who has interviewed him on the War on Terror.
  • In September 2014, The New York Times ran a story about the influence of foreign governments on American think tanks. The Brookings Institution was one of their focuses.
  • In March 2013, Indyk was a panelist at the Soros-funded Center for American Progress. The topic of the discussion was U.S. policy in the Middle East.
  • In 2013, while Indyk was serving as Obama’s special envoy, the Brookings Institution accepted a $14.8 million check from the State of Qatar, a known backer of Hamas in Gaza.
  • Indyk has a history of degrading and insulting comments directed at Israel. He has used the analogy of the United States as a “circus master” who “crack[s] the whip” and gets Israel and other countries in the Middle East to “move around in an orderly fashion.”
  • He has also justified terrorist violence against Israelis, calling it “a plausible safety valve” through which Palestinians can “vent their anger.”

On the topic of the Iran nuclear deal, Indyk has written a pro-deal position paper for Brookings, the most influential think tank in Washington, D.C., (Parts One and Two).  Calling for collaboration with the terror state as a means to avoid war, Indyk writes, “Without an agreement, it is impossible to imagine cooperation with Iran on regional issues… With an agreement, collaboration . . . becomes possible.”

martin indyk

The folly of engaging a soon-to-be nuclear terror state notwithstanding, Indyk proved that he was completely uninterested in the Israeli perspective (which is driven by self-preservation) through an interchange with the former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren.  Following the release of Oren’s book, in which he criticized the Obama administration, Indyk penned a critical review for Foreign Affairs.  He then verbally sparred with Oren on CNN.  Throughout, there is little indication that Israeli and regional (e.g., Jordanian, Saudi Arabian, Egyptian) security concerns figure into Ambassador Indyk’s thinking.

Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster

President Obama’s Senior Advisor is the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.  It was Jarrett who, when working for Mayor Richard Daley in Chicago, first introduced a young Michelle Robinson to Barack Obama.  Ever since then, her influence over the first couple is legendary.  Likely as a result of this domineering influence, other Presidential advisors do not trust Jarrett, nor appreciate her voice in Obama’s ear.  In the words of one former administration official, other presidential advisors “think she’s a spy.”

Reinforcing this view of Jarrett, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), says in regard to Jarrett “She seems to have her tentacles into every issue and every topic… Her name ultimately always comes up.”

The Iranian deal is no exception to the rule:

  • In 2012, news broke that Valerie Jarrett had been acting personally as an emissary to Iran. According to the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot, Jarrett held meetings with Iranian officials in Bahrain over a period of several months.
  • A month prior to the report in Yediot Ahronot, an unnamed source reported that negotiations between Iran and the United States had occurred in Doha, Qatar. (Note: Doha is the home of the Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual leader, Yusuf al-Qaradawi.  It is also where the Taliban opened an embassy in 2013.)  In hindsight, it is very likely Jarrett was the American representative at these talks.
  • Former Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, wrote in his memoir that Jarrett (as well as other advisors such as David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs) “[has] a role in national security decision making that I had not previously experienced.”
  • Jarrett has earned the menacing nickname “Night Stalker” because of her exclusive, regular visits to the White House’s private residence after dark.
  • Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) believes that Valerie Jarrett is responsible for the purge of top-level military commanders over the last several years.
  • Jarrett comes from a family of spies, subversives, and aspirational totalitarians. The FBI had a lengthy file on Jarrett’s father, James Bowman, because he was a Big “C”  Communist Bowman, for example, was in communication with the paid Soviet agent, Alfred Stern.
  • Jarrett’s grandmother, Dorothy Taylor, was an early activist with Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood’s founder was eugenicist Margaret Sanger, who published in her magazine Birth Control an article submitted by Ernst Rüdin, founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene.  The pseudo-science of “racial hygiene” was the Third Reich’s way of justifying their policy of exterminating “undesirables” – the Holocaust – including Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.  (More on Jarrett’s family available here.)

valjar puppet

The elusive and mysterious Jarrett, dubbed by The New Republic as “The Obama Whisperer,” undoubtedly found a willing partner in George Soros to help realize her dream of normalizing relations with Iran, thus paving the way for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.  Soros has provided the financial and organizational means to Jarrett, who controls the President of the United States of America.  Together, the two of them leveraged the Iranian lobby as a counterweight against Israel.  Throughout the ordeal, Jarrett’s puppet responded expertly as his strings were pulled.

In the haunting words of Jarrett herself, regarding Obama, “We have kind of a mind meld… And chances are, what he wants to do is what I’d want to do.

Or else…. ?

Complicity of the GOP

Although the preponderance of the responsibility for the Iranian nuclear deal rests with the progressive left, especially with Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, and George Soros, it behooves recounting the key ways in which Republicans have helped make this disastrous deal a reality.

  • Disgraced Republican Representative Robert Ney helped Trita Parsi to establish the National-Iranian-American Council. Indeed, without Ney and his connections to the establishment (including Karl Rove), it is difficult to conceive how Parsi would have been able to succeed in founding NIAC.
  • Several Republican members of Congress have accepted campaign donations from the Hassan Namazee-connected IAPAC (see above).
  • Obama-appointed Secretary of Defense, Republican Chuck Hagel, was a board member of the Ploughshares Fund, and thus connected to George Soros and various pro-Islamic organizations.
  • Finally, as Andrew McCarthy points out, The Boeing Company is one potential big winner in the deal. They’re also a big GOP donor.  Updating even a fraction of Iran’s commercial airline fleet would be a huge contract.  Specific language wasincluded in the final deal to allow U.S. aircraft manufacturers to sell to Iran, likely to benefit Boeing.  (It is worth noting here Boeing’s massive contracts with the terror-finance center of Qatar.)

Mitch McConnell and John Boehner control Congress, and therefore the power of the purse.  This gives them far more than the ability to merely throw sand in Obama’s gears.  If they had the will, the Iranian deal could have been stopped by threatening to defund Obama’s agenda, period.

Instead, McConnell lamely surrendered and Boehner passed a series of useless resolutions designed to make the Republican base feel good.  Symbolic votes, however, will not stop Iran.

The Republican-controlled Congress put on a decent show for voters, but has done nothing, and apparently has no intention, to stop this disastrous agreement from becoming accepted American policy.

Sellout of Sovereignty to International Business Interests

A few words should be included here on the legal and commercial nature of the Iranian nuclear deal.  The deal’s highly abnormal formulation (not technically a treaty, not strictly a U.N. agreement) creates a number of new paradigms that suggest American sovereignty was not even a thought among the negotiators.  Indeed, it is not even clear that American companies stand to gain much from the deal, in comparison to their European, Russian, and Chinese counterparts.

  • Instead of a traditional treaty, which requires ratification by the U.S. Senate, this deal is a complex of U.N.-centered agreements, overlapping with bi-lateral agreements.
  • Due to the deal’s unusual structure, the Senate was basically powerless to stop it. (To defeat it, Congressional Republicans could have used political guerilla tactics, such as defunding Obama’s agenda.)  This impotence was reinforced once the U.N. Security Council blessed the deal shortly after it was agreed upon by the negotiating parties.
  • The agreement included secret “side deals” that were not presented to the Senate. Included in the deal’s provisions areguarantees for business that, regardless of Iran’s compliance with the agreement, companies would be allowed to continue to do business with Iran.  The agreement also severely limits Congress’s ability to re-impose sanctions on Iran.
  • Almost immediately after the deal was complete, Russia announced that it lifted a ban on the sale of a sophisticated missile system used for air-defense.
  • Likewise, China announced that they would sell Iran 24 J-10 fighter jets. The value of the deal is estimated at $1 billion.
  • Europe is eager to embrace the newly legitimated Iran. Germany, France, Italy, Britain, Austria, Spain, Poland, and Sweden all have plans for Iranian business.

According to one U.S.-based portfolio manager: “I think that the American companies will be welcomed in Iran… This is not a game for junior companies, and I call juniors anything below a billion-dollar market cap. This is a big-money game.”

Yet, strangely, U.S. sanctions on the Iranian regime will remain in force:

“After years of painstaking negotiations and at great political cost, the Obama administration has created a means for foreign businesses to re-enter Iran—but U.S. law still sidelines all but the biggest American multinationals.

Even in the case of big U.S. corporations with foreign subsidiaries, any U.S. citizen employed by an overseas unit would likely be prohibited from participating in transactions with Iran unless granted permission by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Controls, experts said.”

In effect, the deal secures Iranian markets for foreign companies, while American firms still face complex legal and regulatory hurdles should they choose to engage the Iranian market.


The information presented above demands that certain observations are called out, and conclusions drawn.

  • Valerie Jarrett, John Kerry, and George Soros have used Barack Hussein Obama and the Presidency to legitimize Islamic terror. Their plans were helped along by a patient and methodical domestic Iranian lobby.
  • The United States government, in particular the White House and Congress, are deeply corrupt. The representatives of the American people put a higher value on personal profit and reelection than they do on national security and the security of America’s allies.  According to a recent Gallup poll, a full 75% of Americans see “widespread corruption” in their government.
  • The sovereignty of the United States has been sold to the international highest bidder. Congress no longer serves as an effective check on treaty-making. The U.S.A.’s foreign policy is now largely directed by the United Nations, which is, in turn, dominated by the 57-state Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).
  • The Obama administration seems to be more interested in the profitability of foreign companies as opposed to domestic companies. Indeed, a reasonable reading of events indicates that Obama viewed foreign business interests as his best allies in securing the Iran nuclear deal.
  • IAPAC (Iranian-American Political Action Committee) donated the most money to political candidates in 2008. This was certainly to ensure the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
  • From the beginning, the bi-partisan Iranian lobby was tied to Tehran, the United Nations, and George Soros.
  • The United States’ reputation is now tied to that of Iran, the most prolific state sponsor of Islamic terror. Unless a military strike cripples the Iranian nuclear facilities, the terror regime will very soon have nuclear weapons with which to strike Israel, the Gulf region, Europe, and any other enemy within range.

Finally, while it is impossible to predict the future, a few outcomes appear almost certain as a result of the deal.

  • War is more, not less, likely – the arms race has already begun in the region, beginning with a $1 billion deal agreed upon in September between the United States and Saudi Arabia.
  • The United States has lost the trust of Israel. Russia is filling the American vacuum in the Middle East and Africa (i.e. Egypt, Libya, etc.).
  • America’s traditional Gulf allies, who view Iran and their designs for regional hegemony with great trepidation, are rethinking their alliance with Washington. The ice is melting fast, and previously unthinkable alliances and/or cooperation at various levels are taking place.
  • Political Islam is fully legitimized, rather than reformed to be peaceful. Obama’s acquiescence of Tehran is in direct contrast to his harsh treatment of Cairo, and the reform-minded Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

Regardless of who the next American President may be, what will he or she do to rectify this world class nuclear debacle?

[i] Namazi and Nemazee: A Note on Names. It may be that Namazi and Nemazee are different transliterations of the same Persian name.   One internet source suggests that ‘Nemazee’ was the spelling of the name for branch of the family residing in Hong Kong.  Indeed, the Nemazee family was in China and involved with the opium trade.  Though the authors make no claim at a relationship, the possibility seems plausible given the same phonetics and overlapping relationships, interests, and objectives regarding Iran’s relationship with the United States.


ISIS & The Israeli Arab Nexus: How Did This Happen & What Can Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WHILE it is impolitic to state certain truths, well, since when has said “restrictions” mattered at this end? Never and never.

EVEN more so, when it comes to Israel – the only outpost for freedom within the Mid East cesspool, aside from being a highly reliable US ally – there is literally no room for error. Jive-talk alike. Besides, when living among Israel’s Arab population, a certain realistic perspective evolves, or at least it should.

RESULTANT, let it sink in: A distinct majority of Israel’s minority Arab population identify with Israel’s enemies, especially the so-called Palestinian narrative. And it is this allegiance (an Islamic imperative) which causes too many to become entangled with terror, be it actively or through material assistance. Agreed, a small segment are grateful to be living in a country where they not only enjoy equal rights but every opportunity imaginable. As such, recognizing that one doesn’t bite the hand that feeds them, so to speak, they want nothing to do with terror activity. Nevertheless, they are a minority within a minority, and this assessment reflects reality on the ground.

IN this regard, on multiple occasions, this site reported on the entry of ISIS into Israel. It occurred right under the noses of the Shin Bet, Israel’s vaunted internal security services. But before we wade into that, let’s recap how the otherwise highly adept (that is, when political biases are not driving their efforts, ala when they spend valuable resources hunting down Jewish nationalists for the “crime” of saving Judea and Samaria, the Jewish heartland) intelligence agents are hampered by appeasement-addicted leaders. As previously stated:

LET there be no doubt: Israel’s mentally besieged fantasists are running the nation’s “strategic” calculus, such that it is. And this statement is certainly not meant to be flippant, rather, it is heart-wrenching. Nevertheless, it is a realistic assessment borne out of much experience, and it is gleaned through certain in-depth investigations. The fact that this American-Israeli is laser focused on U.S. and Israeli security, rest assured, there is no time (nor inclination) to pussyfoot around. Like it or not.

RESULTANT, if it means taking PM Netanyahu (and his gaggle of associates and sycophantic followers) to the woodshed, so be it. Besides, it is nothing new on this end, and it is not for nothing. In fact, three high-profile interviews did just that:The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot,” “ISIS, Islam And Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free World”  (the 2nd part of the interview), as well as “Can Israel Survive As The Jewish State.” In 3 words, gut-wrenching projects.

STILL yet, in order to grasp what is going on, one has to sink their teeth into the fact that Israel’s security services are second to none: The Shin Bet or GSS,  [General Security Services], Shabak, & ISA [Israel Security Agency]. Let’s just agree on this basis. Even so, and despite being able to uncover this and that (mostly, BEFORE the plot explodes), the fact remains that the PM (the buck stops at his address) refuses to outlaw a main font of said internal terror! Now, it is intrinsic to note that this terror group is embedded INSIDE Israel proper, as opposed to outside the artificially created “green line,” actually, the heart of Judea and Samaria. Never mind the fact that the aforementioned is the Jewish people’s heartland!….continue reading….

IN light of the above, it was duly reported (and confirmed by multiple sources) that ISIS “slipped” into Israel proper. Period. Mind you, Israel is a tiny state comparative to NJ, the fifth-smallest state. Yes, that miniature. This calculated land mass includes Judea and Samaria, aka the “disputed” territories. The point being, few security-related matters happen in Israel (via ultra high-tech “eyes in the sky”, coupled with very adept human intelligence assets sniffing around) which go undetected.

ALAS, back in Dec. 2014, the following was revealed:

ALONG this dangerous terrain, certain matters have come to this investigative journalist’s attention, being an American-Israeli living in Israel. Significantly (and attributed to a Golani Druze journalist, who shall remain nameless), he interviewed Syrian Druze and they credibly documented ISIS, for quite some time, inside their border, one which is adjacent to Israel’s Golan!

THE urgent query becomes: Could it be remotely possible, in any rational reality – with Israel’s second to none “eyes in the sky” and other operational capabilities – that they haven’t seen the “rebels” merging with ISIS, long before this week’s “announcement”? Whom are they kidding?

IN this regard, there is a growing sense of outrage within the Druze community, as they realize that Israel’s leadership “lent” the IDF to quarterback for Obama’s “rebels”, those whom have proven to be (many months ago) ISIS affiliated.

IT gets worse.

ONCE again, a source has confirmed an unfathomable situation: Israel’s gov’t is clearly taking care of the medical needs of Obama’s “rebels”.

REPORTEDLY (another contact would have to go into hiding, if his identity was revealed), Israeli hospitals are at their disposal! Therefore, it is up to others to document the story’s underlying basis.

IN April 2014, over 10 Islamists (identified as either ISIS or Al-Nusra…six of one, half a dozen of another) were being treated in a Tsfat hospital for almost an entire month. To wit, they were separated from the rest of the patients, they were forbidden to walk around the hospital, and they were always guarded by IDF soldiers. By the way, it doesn’t matter a wit how this source was able to identify their presence. That’s neither here nor there… the whole thing….

TO wit, blow back should be expected, as opposed to querying: How the hell did this happen? 

The Northern District Attorney’s Office on Thursday filed indictments with the Nazareth District Court against seven Israeli-Arabs for founding an Islamic State cell to carry out a terror attack on Israel.

The indictment stated that the defendants illegally purchased weapons, made contact with ISIS agents in Syria and started to plan a shooting attack in the Emek Valley.

One of the defendants, Ahmed Ahmad, 26, is already serving a life prison sentence for his involvement in the murder of taxi driver Yafim Weinstein in 2009.

Three more defendants were accused of the most serious crimes and were named as Mahmoud Ihaav Sarif of Nazareth, Ahmad Omer of Hagana and Muhammad Hamad Gazal of Yafia.

Besides those four, the other three defendants were accused of conspiracy to commit a felony and the weapons related crimes.

INDEED, it doesn’t take a security expert to intuit how the above collaboration evolved: An ever-increasing hostile Arab population, in tandem with the “slippage” of Obama backed “rebels” into Israel proper, allowed for contact between certain Arab Israelis with ISIS handlers. Never mind the fact that there are alternative routes to said contacts, but make no mistake: Due to PM Netanyahu’s strategic (“rebel-backed”) calculus – or lack thereof – it made it easier to connect up. 

MIND you, this is the same PM – unparalleled orator that he is – who continually implores the UN to cease bashing Israel. Hmm. Is this not indicative of delusional thinking? In reality, said expectation is akin to expecting dogs to cease barking at those who come knocking at the door! Credo quia absurdum.

NOT only that, begging PA Arabs (enemies in general) to make peace with Israel is comparative to imploring them to shed their Muslim (and anti-semitic) skin! Understood? 

On Thursday night, Eitam and Naama Henkin were killed in cold blood by Palestinian terrorists who drove by their car and riddled them with bullets. The incident would have caught the attention of the Israeli public in any case. But the fact that the couple was gunned down in front of their four children — aged 9 and under, with the youngest being a 6-month-old baby — made the attack that much more heart-wrenching.

Even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s voice cracked slightly while issuing an official statement on the tragedy, in which he expressed deep sorrow for the orphans. This was mere hours after he addressed the U.N. General Assembly in New York and said he was “prepared to immediately, immediately, resume direct peace negotiations with the Palestinian Authority without any preconditions whatsoever.”

Turning to the Palestinian Authority leader, whose own speech, delivered the day before, was a tirade of threats to renege on all agreements signed with Israel, Netanyahu said, “President [Mahmoud] Abbas, I know it’s not easy. I know it’s hard. But we owe it to our peoples to try, to continue to try, because together, if we actually negotiate and stop negotiating about the negotiation, if we actually sit down and try to resolve this conflict between us, recognize each other, not use a Palestinian state as a stepping stone for another Islamist dictatorship in the Middle East, but something that will live at peace next to the Jewish state, if we actually do that, we can do remarkable things for our peoples.”

Netanyahu went on to appeal to the U.N. to cease “encouraging Palestinian rejectionism,” and to Abbas to “stop libeling Israel, stop inciting hatred and violence … [and] stop spreading lies about Israel’s alleged intentions on the Temple Mount, [where] … militant Islamists … are smuggling explosives into the Al-Aqsa mosque and … trying to prevent Jews and Christians from visiting the holy sites.”

He could have saved his breath, as he did when making a 44-second pregnant pause at the podium — a gimmick that has earned the address the title of “neum hashtika,” or the “speech of silence.” As he well knows, nobody is listening, least of all Abbas, whose only concern of late is that the nuclear deal with Iran, the slaughter in Syria and the refugee crisis in Europe have been upstaging him abroad, the way Hamas is doing at home.

But it is not only Hamas in Gaza that welcomed the double murder of an Israeli mother and father. Palestinians in Jerusalem and the West Bank have been celebrating the event with glee…..continue reading….

ADDING insult to grave mendacity, PM Netanyahu is well aware that if not for HUSSEIN Obama’s efforts, Iran would hardly be joining the nuclear club, and with the imprimatur of the U.S. to boot! Therefore, the fact that he stated “President [Barack] Obama has said that he is committed to preventing dangerous weapons coming into the hands of Iran’s proxies, that he wants to prevent Iran from destabilizing countries in the Middle East,” is beyond reason.

EVEN so, it is hardly a question of whether or not the Shin Bet (and related assets) will (eventually) round-up particular suspects. Yes, this expectation is basically a given. Still yet, what most have a hard time wrapping their brains around is that a Jewish leadership is reflexively blinded, when it comes to the enemy within.

AS to the query: What can be done? Well, the main caveat is hardly rocket science, that’s for sure. In a nutshell, a complete volte-face, a mental paradigm shift (vis-à-vis Israel’s internal fifth column and outside enemies alike, particularly, the PA/Fatah Abbas led junta) has to take place within Israel’s top leadership. Think of it as a trickle down effect.

IN turn, a long-awaited (by secular and religious Zionists) national pride will emerge, leading to an invigorated ability to execute real strategic imperatives. Significantly, regardless of pressures exerted by leftists and Arabists within Israel and beyond its borders, Israel will stand tall and unapologetic. Thus, protecting the Jewish homeland at any – and all – cost will sit atop their strategic calculus.

IN other words, instead of chasing ghosts, expecting those who wish Israel ill to change, the change that MUST take place has to be on the leadership level, starting at the PM’s helm. 

AFTER all, if one’s national leadership is supine, effectively, begging the “other” to accept Israel’s “existence”, how successful a “strategy” is that??

CASE closed.

(Below, Israel’s internal Arab fifth column arrested for plotting with ISIS….pics of others were unavailable!)

israeli tards for islamic state

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Report}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

HUSSEIN Obama Imported 1,500 Jihadis To US! America’s Most Dangerous Man, De Facto, The Free World’s. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

COUNTLESS are aware that the leader of the free world is endangering America, let alone the west in toto. However, many find it hard to grasp his methodology, in effect, the devilish details. Yes, they feel the hair on the back of their necks rising, but they can’t figure out the whys and wherefores. No matter, as always, this site fills in the blanks.

MOST recently, HUSSEIN Obama signed off on upwards of 100,000 “refugees” from Islamic jihadi nations to gain citizenship. This onslaught adds to the countless illegals inside America via his open sesame border policy. Surely, such behavior is more than questionable, regardless of anything else. Agreed?

YET, before we segue to the latest “news”, let’s clarify the part played by DHS’s Director Jeh Johnson, and duly reiterated in July 2015:

IT is under this glaring and microscopic examination that HUSSEIN Obama’s DHS treachery is exposed for what it is. Yes, some may inquire: Even so, what difference does it make, after all, what can be done to stop this behemoth? Not so fast.

ACTUALLY, the more Jeh Johnson, DHS’s Director, is placed under the spotlight he is forced to defend the strategies – or lack thereof – of his agency. This is precisely why certain folks – in particular, whistle blowers – are prime targets of harassment campaigns and other silencing and menacing tactics.

(VIDEO: DHS Agent Exposed Obama!  Feds Take Her Job, Her Reputation . . . And Go After Her DAUGHTER!)

AS to Special Border Agent Julia Davis….O M G! And the targeted list goes on, duly supported by (yet to be revealed) copious amounts of confidential info within this domain. It is off the charts.

ARE the readers sensing a pattern, as to DHS’s malignant behavior? Hope so.

IN this regard, a concerted amount of energy is expended to highlight the dangers underwritten by Obama Inc.’s DHS. Consider: while this site has already revealed a lengthy list of evidence, suffice to state that a most recent one (June 2015) encapsulates its essence via DHS and its Mafia-like tentacles. More than indicting….continue reading

TO wit, once again, it is into this national (international alike) nightmare that Obama’s goons strike. Recently, upwards of 1,500 (this is the confirmed amount, yet, many more have gained entry via officialdom) “refugee” terrorists were let into America by Obama Inc.’s terrorists-in-suits!

The Obama administration allowed 1,519 terror-stained foreign refugees into the U.S. last year because their crimes were allegedly committed “while under duress.”

The administration last year eased federal restrictions against terrorist activity for refugees and asylum seekers. Under the old rules, these 1,519 foreign nationals would have been banned from entering the country because they supported terrorist causes.

But under the new rules for vetting refugees, the secretary of Homeland Security has “discretionary authority” to waive certain cases of inadmissibility relating to terrorist activity.

A person could have provided shelter or sold a weapon to a terrorist, for instance, then claimed he did not know that the person being helped was a terrorist or that he was forced to provide the aid under duress.

“We’ve seen this discretionary authority abused in the last few years and, in fact, the administration has eliminated a zero-tolerance policy for granting asylum or residency to individuals who have provided any sort of terrorism-related support,” said a release from Judicial Watch Tuesday.

The watchdog agency said the federal government’s latest available figures for granting asylum or residency to foreigners participating in terrorist causes are “incredibly disturbing, especially since the agency charged with keeping the nation safe, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), appears to downplay the seriousness of the crimes.”

Judicial Watch obtained the numbers from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services annual report to Congress on the DHS secretary’s application of discretionary authority.

The biggest chunk of exemptions was processed for refugee applicants and lawful permanent resident status with 806 and 614, respectively.

The U.S. took in 70,000 foreign refugees in fiscal 2015, which ends Sept. 30, and Obama has decided to increase that number to 85,000 in 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. In addition to the refugees, the U.S. takes in about 25,000 asylees every year.

The remainder of the terror-connected persons were processed under other DHS programs such as temporary protected status, or TPS, which allows foreign persons here as students, tourists or other reasons to stay beyond their visa expirations due to natural disasters or wars in their homelands.

“The bottom line is that the U.S. government is allowing them all to stay in the country with rights and benefits afforded to legal residents despite their terrorist connections and associations,” said Judicial Watch.

More than half of the candidates rewarded by DHS last year provided material support to terrorist organizations, according to the DHS report. The others received military-type training from a terrorist organization, voluntarily provided medical care to members of a terrorist group and solicited funds or individuals for membership in a terrorist organization.

After a case-by-case review, Obama DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson determined that the recently admitted terrorists only participated in these activities “while under duress.”

This effort was officially launched last year when the administration quietly changed the Immigration and Nationality Act, or INS, implemented decades ago to govern immigration and citizenship in the United States….continue here

INDEED, is it any wonder that American Muslims are playing such prominent roles as top commanders in ISIS’s ranks? Nope. They have the blessing of the Jihadi-in-Chief!


Related image

STILL yet, since some readers appreciate more scholarly renditions, presenting, a close associate, Professor Paul Eidelberg:

The Hidden Agenda of Barack Obama

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

The old concept of “world government” has surfaced again, this from more or less elusive statements of Barack Obama, a self-professed multicultural moral relativist.

Barack Obama’s political objective has ever been to emasculate the United States.  He abhors the concept of American exceptionalism, which represents the antithesis of everything he stands for as a pseudo-Muslim with a Marxist agenda.

As I have demonstrated in books and articles, American Exceptionalism is rooted in America’s primary foundational document, the Declaration of Independence. The pivotal concept of the Declaration is, “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” The God affirmed in the Declaration is none other than the God of Israel.

In fact, James Wilson, next to Madison the most important participant during the debates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, regarded the concept of the “laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” an abbreviation of the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality embodied in the Book of Genesis.

Wilson was a professor of law. He was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President George Washington. His position regarding “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” was shared by educated men of the eighteenth century, in Europe as well as in America.

America’s Founding Fathers never harbored any doubt about the wisdom and propriety of the Nation State system. Indeed, the concept of the nation-state is sanctioned and exemplified in the Bible of Israel, hence long before the 1648 Peace Treaty of Westphalia.

Moreover, it was the nation-state system that produced the extraordinary intellectual and political freedom as well as the material progress of Western Civilization – the progress that led to the abolition of slavery and the alleviation of toil, poverty, and disease  – and not only in the western world.

Although the nation-state system has not eliminated war, the basic fault lies not in the “system,” but in the frailties of human nature, that is, in mankind’s failure to abide by the Seven Noahide Laws of universal morality, which no form of World Government can provide or effectively prescribe short of tyranny.

Indeed, a World Government would require an absolute monopoly of military power, as well as a worldwide network of spies in every country to thwart any local attempt to develop weapons that could challenge that central power.

Such a government would be no less tyrannical than any Mullocracy or Islamic dictatorship.  Is this the hidden agenda of the Obama-Iranian nuclear agreement?

Consider the following facts:

First, Obama has shown nothing but scorn for America’s foundational documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Second, Obama, as a self-professed Muslim, indicates that he rejects the Biblical as well as American principle that all men are born equal.

Third, consistent with the preceding, Obama genuflected to King Abdullah, a Muslim despot. He thereby displayed a foreign loyalty antithetical to America.

Fourth, Obama has displayed a hostile attitude toward Israel, America’s most important political and ideological ally.

Fifth, Obama has undermined America’s worldwide standing as a nation dedicated to freedom.

Sixth, Obama has devastated the American economy and saddled the country with enormous debt.

Seventh, Obama has slashed U.S. defense expenditures.

Eighth, Obama’s multicultural moral relativism undermines American pride in the nobility and justice of the nation’s cause, as exemplified in America’s rescuing Europe from Nazi and Communist tyranny.

Ninth, Obama has displayed a less than tepid attitude toward Islamic terrorism.

Tenth, Obama’s appointment of Muslims to key positions of his administration, such as the Department of Homeland Security and the CIA, indicates that he does not regard Islam as an adversary of the United States.

For these and other reasons, the present writer regards Obama as America’s most dangerous enemy, hence, that every lawful means should be taken to remove him from office as soon as possible!◙

INCONTESTABLY, in no uncertain terms (and fully evidenced at these pages), there IS a method to HUSSEIN Obama’s “madness.” Basically, facilitating the upending of America, whatever it takes, aids in ushering two parallel objectives: The New World Order, AGENDA 21 (amply fast tracked by the Pope’s “blessing”, during his recent visit, his “koshering”) and an (eventual) Islamic Caliphate


AS repeatedly emphasized, said end goals are not contradictory. Not at all. This is because the UN is absolutely held “captive” by third world Islamic nations (OIC, Organization of Islamic Cooperation) that are Allah-bent on raping first world nations of their assets. Leftist leaders are completely in sync with said end point. Yes, the red-green alliance. Climate change, anyone?

MORE specifically, these same majority held nations are in a position to place the heretofore first world nations into subservient status. Now, if anyone believes this is poppycock and “conspiracy” mongering, well, just dismiss the decimation unfolding in Europe  – via these same Islamic “refugees” – as merely “coincidental.”


MIND you, those who are unfamiliar with the jihadi arena – coupled with little knowledge of the parts played by Obama Inc. – are more likely to give them the benefit of the doubt. Fatal error.

THE fact of the matter is that aside from a veritable mountain of evidence housed at this site, it is also the case that prima facie malfeasance – under HUSSEIN Obama’s FED apparatus – is a done deal. Said compelling evidence is most resonant at the following investigation: “Islamic Money/Gold Laundering In Massachusetts Finances Jihad, FEDS Ignore Evidence!” 

Image result for pics of gold laundering

IN the same manner few would have believed, even 5 years ago, what is taking place before their horrified eyes, so too they will dismiss these same warnings re the entry of KNOWN jihadists into America ala the convoluted explanations offered by Obama Inc.’s DHS.

Animated Pants on Fire

THUS, it is not a question what HUSSEIN Obama’s goals are, the open query is: How soon will they come into effect? Well, from this site’s considered opinion, it will be sooner than later. Forewarned. Forearmed.

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at DC WATCHDOG}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Facebook Colluding With (Communist-Infused) Merkel: Negative Posts Re “Refugees” Censored! Free Speech Under Assault. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


THERE is little but spitting distance between history’s right-wing fascist leaders and their counterparts on the left. Both are hell-bent on imposing their iron-fisted will, and they brook NO dissent. That is that. Moreover, Islamist leaders feel very much at home within both spheres, in so far as totalitarian ethos is their commonality with each spectrum, irrespective of religious (or the lack thereof) gaps.

NOW, as is said, this is where the rubber meets the road, when it comes to Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel. Ominously, many are clueless about her anti-western background. However, thankfully, cracks are opening up. How so?

WELL, illustrative, let’s take the case of a born and bred country fella (personally, find them refreshing, as opposed to the metrosexual type, but let’s not digress) to bring a basic example to the fore, one who spent the first 40 years of his life on a farm. Yet, later on in life, he lands in a cosmopolitan city, only to change his entire outward appearance to throw off his country boy background. Alas, would said makeover fool those closest to him? Of course not. Extrapolating further, steroid-like, Merkel (until her mid-years in the early 1990’s, she is currently 61 years old) was (likely, still is) a well-connected part of the communist apparatus. This is a historical fact. How many are aware of her actual background, both familial and personal? Didn’t think so.

A new biography covering Chancellor Angela Merkel’s life in East Germany has caused a stir by suggesting she was closer to the communist apparatus and its ideology than previously thought.

Published this week and written by journalists Günther Lachmann and Ralf Georg Reuth, the book quotes Gunter Walther, a former colleague of hers at the Academy of Sciences in East Berlin, as saying she had been secretary for “Agitation and Propaganda” in the Freie Deutsche Jugend (FDJ) youth organization at the institute. Merkel, a trained physicist, worked at the academy from 1978 until 1989.

Excerpts from the book, “The First Life of Angela M.,” were published in the news magazine Focus on Monday. The mass-circulation Bild newspaper has also given the book prominent coverage in recent days.

The book explores Merkel’s life growing up in German Democratic Republic (GDR), where her father Horst Kasner was a Protestant pastor and a committed socialist. He moved to East Germany from West Germany in 1954.

Merkel has said in the past that her FDJ role at the academy was more that of a cultural secretary and that her duties included buying theater tickets and organizing book readings.

‘Closeness to the System’

But former German Transport Minister Günther Krause — an eastern German politician who worked with her in the final months of the GDR and as a fellow minister in the government ex-chancellor Helmut Kohl in the early 1990s — contradicts her in the book and says she propagated Marxism-Leninism.

“With Agitation and Propaganda you’re responsible for brainwashing in the sense of Marxism,” he said. “That was her task and that wasn’t cultural work. Agitation and Propaganda, that was the group that was meant to fill people’s brains with everything you were supposed to believe in the GDR, with all the ideological tricks. And what annoys me about this woman is simply the fact that she doesn’t admit to a closeness to the system in the GDR. From a scientific standpoint she wasn’t indispensable at the Academy of Sciences. But she was useful as a pastor’s daughter in terms of Marxism-Leninism. And she’s denying that. But it’s the truth.”

On Sunday evening, Merkel said she hadn’t covered up anything about her past. “I can only rely on my memory,” she said at a public screening of her favorite movie, a popular love film made in East Germany, on Sunday night. “If something turns out to be different, I can live with that.”

Her spokesman, Steffen Seibert, denied on Monday that the chancellor had ever covered up political aspects of her life in East Germany. “The chancellor has been making statements about her life in the GDR for years in books and interviews,” he said. “She always answered questions openly and based on her honest memories.”

The book adds that Merkel and her father refused all attempts by the Ministry for State Security or Stasi, the feared secret police, to recruit them as informants.

A Latecomer to the East German Reform Movement

Merkel, who speaks good Russian, was well informed about Perestroika and the distancing of the Soviet government from the East German regime, the book says. She read Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev’s speeches in the Communist Party newspaper Pravda, and made contacts with East German reform groups only a few months before the Berlin Wall fell in November 1989.

The book says she and her father and brother Marcus discussed political developments with other people on September 1989. For them, the biography says, German unification was still inconceivable at that point “not just because it wouldn’t have fitted into the bipolar world but because they strictly rejected the Western system of society.”

It quotes Merkel as having said at the time: “If we reform the GDR, it won’t be in terms of the Federal Republic.”

Merkel’s political ascent after that is well documented. She joined the opposition political movement Demokratischer Aufbruch (Democratic Awakening) in December 1989, became deputy spokeswoman of the democratically elected transitional East German government after the May 1990 election and joined the staunchly conservative Christian Democratic Union party in 1990s — a surprising move given her apparent previous political leanings.

‘Not Many Know What She’s Really Thinking’

The chancellor at the time, Helmut Kohl spotted her potential and made her family affairs minister in his cabinet after the November 1990 German election. The rest is history.

“Only Angela Merkel herself can answer how much of her old life is still in her,” Focus magazine wrote.

EVEN so, some may query, that was then and this is now, what diff does it make? A whole lot. Enter…her hot mic with Facebook’s Zuckerberg, yes, that Napoleon wannabe.


ZuckerbergGermanCensor Link

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was overheard confronting Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg over incendiary posts on the social network, Bloomberg reported on Sunday, amid complaints from her government about anti-immigrant posts in the midst of Europe’s refugee crisis.

On the sidelines of a United Nations luncheon on Saturday, Merkel was caught on a hot mic pressing Zuckerberg about social media posts about the wave of Syrian refugees entering Germany, the publication reported.

The Facebook CEO was overheard responding that “we need to do some work” on curtailing anti-immigrant posts about the refugee crisis. “Are you working on this?” Merkel asked in English, to which Zuckerberg replied in the affirmative before the transmission was disrupted….continue reading….

HERE’S the crux: True to form, the leader of a so-called democratic Republic couldn’t help but revert to her ideological and inner base. In other words, digging back to her roots as East Germany’s secretary for “Propaganda and Agitation”, she is using every means at her disposal to squelch the truth about the Islamist “refugees.” In this regard, she stated to Facebook’s Zuckerberg (this is unlikely her first stop in Germany’s silencing campaign), effectively dictating: Only positive feedback/propaganda about the “refugees” should be allowed, and all negative content must be silenced. Yes, her communist ethos is coming full circle.

AS to Zuckerberg, although a die-hard capitalist when it comes to his own wealth and greed, ideologically, he is a leftist revolutionary akin to many of the hypocrites among the uber rich. Not only that, his “sympathies” lie deep within Islam’s camp, and that too has been revealed at these pages and elsewhere.

DEMONSTRABLY, in mid 2014, jihadists on Facebook made death threats against anti-jihadists at Islam Exposed, a well-trafficked website with an attendant FB group page. Moreover, a particular threat by a Iranian jihadi was aimed in this immediate direction, yet, stone cold silence on Zukie’s endeven though the threats emerged from various Facebook pages and the powers that be were duly aware of the situation.

AS such, in the same manner that one can’t place lipstick on a pig and expect it to become beautified, so too one should not be shocked – albeit, outraged to the max –  that Germany’s leader is behaving true to form; akin to any dictator from a communist/Marxist/Leninist background who believes that freedom of speech is not a fundamental right.

INDEED, this is precisely where Zuckerberg fits in, in so far as it is now known that he has little issue with complying with said dictates, even though born and bred in the US. After all, he came of age at a time when the Democratic Party is ruled by far left socialists/communists/Marxists – pick your poison – and freedom of speech has been silenced in a myriad of ways, least of which can be dangerous to one’s health – literally. In fact, just check with Breitbart and Hastings…oops, they are six feet under. Incontrovertibly, HUSSEIN Obama’s hench people ensured their silence! Murderous thugs.

MONSTROUSLY, US media – be it social media, traditional print, or tv – has been bought off by domestic and foreign interests, and this is no longer in doubt. 



FOLKS, in light of the aforementioned collusion between the most prominent leader of the European Union and the head of the largest social media platform, is it any wonder that this investigative journalist previously asserted: US media is waging a omerta, regarding the Islamic-Euro (Hijrah) invasion! In effect, at the same time that the leadership of the free world is tightening free speech, similarly, Merkel is doing the same.  

MOST significantly, the inestimable Mark Steyn spoke at the Danish Free Speech Society, and he warned the public what is at stake. In tandem, one can catch a glimpse of the same horrific situation, and it was spelled out at the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) Conference in Warsaw, Poland.



INHERENTLY, western leaders are working assiduously to squelch all those who refuse to toe the leftist and Islamist narrative. Time will tell if the public revolts or becomes quieted, the results of which couldn’t be any starker in contrast. Graver.

Mark Zuckerberg Caught on Hot Mic Saying Facebook Will Censor Anti-Migrant Posts


{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}